Hi,
My name is Stephen Joseph, the Business Development Manager at one of the
leading email database providing companies.
Our area of expertise lies specifically in the major industrial lists like:
Agriculture, Business Services, Chambers of Commerce, Cities, Towns &
Municipali
ere are obvious structural differences
in the OpenBSD source tree that I do not understand, or I would start work on
it myself. The FreeBSD side looks fairly simple.
Thank you.
-Stephen
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
Hi,
There was a thread about this quite a while back where if the
interface didn't exist pf wouldn't start.
It's probably the wrong way to do it, but my dsl connection is
controlled by a crontab script that runs every minute or so to see if
line is up (my line is quite bad). at end of script it
On 1/17/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And yet pf doesn't care about interfaces that don't exist if your
> syntax is correct.
> Note that I had
> to comment out the set loginterface which can't possibly work if tun0
> doesn't exist.
so pretty much it won't load at start time if
ut 10 seconds, and i think my mate's
iburst connects in less than 30 seconds) and -then- runs pf -f
/etc/pf.conf
that should do the trick
stephen
On 1/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I am using freebsd 6.0 with PF and running a A
from any to any
pass in on $int_if proto { udp,tcp }from any to any port {
135,137:139,445 } keep state
pass out on $int_if proto { udp,tcp }from any to any port {
135,137:139,445 } keep state
and ran tcpdump again:
Tue Apr 19 09:17:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/stephen# t
On 4/13/05, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/13/05, stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/13/05, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 4/13/05, stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >You're not allowing any ipe
On 4/13/05, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/13/05, stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You're not allowing any ipencap traffic on your tun interface. One
> more thing: you have "block in on $ext_if all" twice.
>
Ah yeah... I do have it corr
ten it how I have.
I'm also struggling to get pflog to show anything (I want it to show
everything, not just the blocked traffic, would this implying having
'log' in every rule I have?)... left it running for a while and it
showed nothing, even with myself purposely trying to conn
.89.254> (10.0.89.254 <http://10.0.89.254>): 56
data bytes
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
--- 10.0.89.254 <http://10.0.89.254> ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
I may be doing something stupid in either of the two problems, but perhaps
a look from someone else will spot something I have not noticed..
Thanks in advance,
Stephen.
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:02:50 +0100, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2005 12:41, stephen wrote:
> > Having a little difficulty regarding traffic counting.
> >
> > I have a macro ($soh) with about 30 IPs in it.. The first problem I
> > was
one possibly help rectify this?
(they are also the last rules in the ruleset so the "last match wins"
is correct)
Thanks
Stephen
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
in the ruleset so the "last match wins"
is correct)
Thanks
Stephen
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
13 matches
Mail list logo