hello everyone,
i'm just following this thread but this actually sounds very
interesting and useful.
i prefer using freebsd running on key hosts in networks - like you
said, firewalls, for example.
having such tool ootb would be a worthy addition.
- b
2010/5/27 Martin Matuska :
> Well, what rela
regarding hfsc, let me provide you 2 interesting links:
http://www.probsd.net/pf/index.php/Hednod's_HFSC_explained
https://calomel.org/pf_hfsc.html
- b
2010/4/12 Z Wing :
> Oh I see, so you set that initally but each queue will definitely borrow from
> the parent queue (up to upperlimit)? with
sorry for the long delay - happy new year btw ;)
i still believe your problem has to do with mss/mtu sizes. i am no
professional on that topic but i assume there are options to fix this
- either in your pppoe client (that your router is supposed to use) or
in your firewall config.
i remember myse
i've had such problems when using a mtu other than 1492...
sorry, have no other solution.
2009/5/17 Max Laier :
> On Sunday 17 May 2009 23:08:32 Kevin Smith wrote:
>> You mean the ext_ad macro right ?
>>
>> What do you tell with that to pf, and why do I need it, can you tell me
>> ? :)
>
> http://
linux is in many ways very similar to bsd.i'd suggest using debian as it is
known to be very stable.
and better use debian 5.0 (aka 'lenny') which is the current stable release.
if you like more up-to-date software _and_ a high level of stability, try
testing (currently called 'squeeze') - or compl
