Re: How make the route-to working ?

2010-02-13 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
ply-to' rule on eth1's inbound, as David > DeSimone suggested. > > A third and cleaner solution would be to use multiple routing-tables - > see setfib(1) and 'options ROUTETABLES' of the kernel... I have searched the net high and low and I can not find any go

Re: state of pf port in 8.x

2009-05-12 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
g to see OpenBSD's Active / Active in 8.0 Sam Fourman Jr. ___ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: PF + ALTQ - Bandwidth per customer

2009-02-13 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
nto FreeBSD -CURRENT? Matt, made it sound like Max was thinking about putting it in FreeBSD here: http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=dfbsd-kernel&a=2008-04&m=6979148 also does anyone happen to have a patch to apply NetBSD's Window scale to FreeBSD? Sam Fourman Jr. Fourman Networks __

Re: PF + ALTQ - Bandwidth per customer

2008-12-02 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Kahlil Erwin Talledo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: >>> I had forgotten that dummynet can be used with pf. Maybe i should start this >>> with a new subject but it is directly related in that I need bandwidth >>

Re: PF + ALTQ - Bandwidth per customer

2008-12-02 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
ctually can use DummyNet w/ pf to limit bandwidth per ip? is there anyway to say.. ip address x must be used with MAC Address y then follow the per ip bandwidth limit if not then drop all traffic in and out? Sam Fourman Jr. Fourman Networks ___ f

Re: PF + ALTQ - Bandwidth per customer

2008-12-01 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
this may, and I asked a few of the pfsense devlopers this exact question it was meet with limited feedback. I guess what I would like to know is What is the limitation of what we can achieve with FreeBSD would it be appropriate given the topic to cross post this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sam Fourm

Re: Why the old version of pf?

2008-08-11 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
>> Just curious why FreeBSD 7 has to use an old version of pf? There's >> been so many improvements! I'd very much like to use the new IP range >> feature for instance, so I can reduce does anyone know how to find our what version of pf FreeBSD is currently using? a s

Re: Why the old version of pf?

2008-08-11 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
> And now 4.4 is in sight already and has a lot more stuff ... > though there seem to be some problems with some of the new stuff ... What stuff is causing trouble, I could cherry pick a few patches and test. Sam Fourman Jr. ___ freebsd-pf@freeb

Re: Updating PF

2007-08-31 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On 8/31/07, Gergely CZUCZY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 01:24:39PM +, Ricardo Benq wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm using PF from a 6.1 FreeBSD kernel (Just added pf_enable="YES" in > > rc.conf) and also using Firewall Builder. > > How do I know what version is running? >

Re: testing load balancig work.

2007-04-24 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
Does someone have a sample pf.conf using 2 external connections in a load balanced or round robin fasion. I would like to use one as a refrence when buildinf my firewall / Router Sam Fourman Jr. On 4/24/07, Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 04/24/07 18:27, cangak wrote: > i

Re: bandwidth limiting per ip with PF and ALTQ

2007-04-23 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
yeah I was stumped on this as well, I was wanting to know how to have 2 upstream ISP's, and limit bandwidth to a pool of 192.168.x.x address but have it round robin the downloads. if someone could spare a working sample that would be Great Sam Fourman Jr. On 4/23/07, Andrei Manescu &l