00 will have a major impact.
Donations of any kind are welcome, including new or used household
goods, clothing, furniture, computers, and in fact, anything that you
have to spare.
Collection can be arranged by appointment.
Contact Robert
Cell No. 0827876997
Email: rob...
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
>
> I've seen similar things happen on SSH, that were due to a combination of
> "scrub"ing and states expiring. Turning off scrub rules on SSH specifically
> cured the scenario for me but I don't see an indication of whether or not
> you are
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Robert,
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 06:19:34PM -0500, Robert Simmons wrote:
> R> Over the course of a few hours there are a handful of SSH packets that
> R> are being blocked both in and out. This does not seem t
Over the course of a few hours there are a handful of SSH packets that
are being blocked both in and out. This does not seem to affect the
SSH session, and all the blocked packets have certain flags set [FP.],
[R.], [P.], [.], [F.]. The following is my ruleset abbreviated to the
rules that apply to
I am having problems setting up Tor's DNSPort using pf. In FreeBSD
8.x I was able to just run Tor with the "DNSPort 53" config file
option with no problems. Now, with 9.1, when I run it with that
option, I get a permission denied error when trying to bind port 53 on
localhost. I assume this is f
.
http://wiki.polymorf.fr/index.php/Howto:FreeBSD_jail_vnet
Example of setup PF + VIMAGE + netgragh
http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/vimage.shtml
I am attaching an example pic of said panics.
http://i40.tinypic.com/2q00etz.jpg
Any advice on solving this will be appreciated.
Robert
El 30 de gener de 2012 18:47, Bjoern A. Zeeb ha escrit:
> As posted previously to freebsd-pf we shall unifdef pf as soon as someone
> get some other work in, so the entire #ifdef __FreeBSD__ checks would be
> gone.
>
> I think that's a lot better solution than further mangling things.
Ok, I'll ju
route over an existing one
my $ROUTECHECKCOMMAND = 'pfctl -qt blackhole -Tshow';
...
-
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.freenix.fr
In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/
___
freebsd-pf
de, fast forwarding is unlikely to make a
difference. Depending on the cache/memory/CPU trade-off, you might find
turning off flowtable support helps -- net.inet.flowtable.enable=0.
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
___
f
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Max Laier wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 00:02:04 Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Max Laier wrote:
Please help testing. It's been confirmed to work for IPFW, let's make
sure pf is in good shape, too. Thanks.
A casual glance at pf.c suggests
if the socket pointer is NULL" bug that
ipfw(4) did, but confirmation that things work properly would definitely be
good.
Thanks,
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Please test ipfw and pf uid/gid/jail rules
to me.
My configuration worked fine before the update to 7.0-P3 like i said, but if
we fix the rules then we can begin the process of elimanation.
Thank's so much guys
From: *Robert Jameson* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:59 AM
To: freebsd-stable <[EMAIL PROTECTED
According to clemens fischer:
> "In RELENG_7 - pf is at OpenBSD 4.1"
>
> shouldn't pfsync be of a more recent version, then?
Yes, you need pfflowd 0.7 to understand pfsync3.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Darwin sidhe.kelti
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote:
So far I have had 0 (zero) reports of problems since this thread began.
Could people using uid/gid/jail rules with ipfw or pf on 7.x *please* try
running their firewalls without
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Paul Allen wrote:
From Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:36:50AM -0700:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote:
So far I have had 0 (zero) reports of problems since this thread began.
Could people using uid/gid/jail
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote:
[ Excess CC-list ... testers needed!!! ]
On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all:
This is a reminder e-mail that, in the very near future, Giant
compatibility shims for network protocols will be removed.
<...>
The *only* remainin
ies, which require more
intimate knowledge of the link type. It might be desirable to add a socket
option to allow the specification of the source address in order to allow
packet replay tools, etc, to work without link layer knowledge.
Robert N M Watson_
someboy told me that alq +hsfc only supports under 1000 queues
is that true ?
i have 5, 6 big queues ( 7-8Mb) with 500, 600 subqueues
will it work ?
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscri
I had pf running on a bridge but it doesn't seemd to work.
The firsti problem was that bridge0 didn't appear at the ifconfig command
but the bridge worked
And the second was that pf didn't limit the bandwidth .
Does pf work on a bridge ?
___
freebsd-pf@f
does anybody know a good guid to set up mrtg
it's killing me
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
can pf do address mapping ?
i hava a server with 5 ips on the ext_if
and i want to map an ip to let's say 192.168.1.11
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
I am using pf on a bridge and
i want to know if i can limit the download
and upload because i read on the net that
it's impossible
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mai
this is what i get when i try to start pf
in the home256 queue i have 80 clients
i have 1GB RAM and a 3Ghz processor
pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Cannot allocate memory
cam asa arata pful
altq on $int_if hfsc bandwidth 100Mb queue { default, manager, home256 }
queue default bandwidth 8Kb hfsc(default)
this is my problem i have 80 clients in the home256 queue
this is how my pf.conf looks
i have 1GB RAM
and 3Ghz P4
pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Cannot allocate memory
cam asa arata pful
altq on $int_if hfsc bandwidth 100Mb queue { default, manager, home256 }
queue default bandwidth 8Kb hfsc(default)
q
On 6/19/05, Abu Khaled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/19/05, Robert Usle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using FreeBSD 5.4 with ipfw (module) & pf (kernel compiled) firewall.
> >
> > pf is used for nat, pass/block, rdr,
icy drop
set require-order yes
scrub in all
Is this related to firewall processing order ?
Thanks,
--
Robert
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
26 matches
Mail list logo
