On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:21:16 +0300
Artyom Viklenko wrote:
> Len Conrad wrote:
> > I've used bruteblock, which manages ipfw, for blocking SMTP
> > attackers and reducing smtp connects by 10s of 1000s per day.
> >
> > But bruteblock, which hasn't moved in 3 years, logged a lot of
> > errors like
re of that, but have you tried this on a production system?
Or at least on a system with high enough number of classes, let's say
1K, 2K or more? How stable would that system be? Just curious...
> Nickola Kolev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > ?? Thu, 08 Nov 20
fw pipe' or pf altq enoug freebsd based
> solution? ;-)
IPFW is a mere traffic shaper, and not a traffic control solution. Will
pf/altq be flexible enough with its limit of 64 classes?
--
Regards,
Nickola Kolev
pgpE0Eu2gfrss.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 19:54:05 +0200
Nickola Kolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hello, fellow posters
[ cut ]
Sorry, this is more appropriate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My appologies.
Cheers,
Nickola
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing lis
luding
src/dst AS information.
Maybe some netgraph module besides ng_netflow, which I tried, but of no
avail.
Sorry if my question seems a bit messy.
Cheers,
Nickola Kolev
___
Hello,
Currently I have a GNU/Linux based router, which is serving as a
traffic control gateway for a /19 network. Right now, there are about
6000 classes in a hierarchy, built upon the hierarchycal token bucket
qdisc.
I'd like to build a Free/Open/NetBSD router, utilizing ALTQ+pf, to
replace the
