RE: pf between two lans

2009-07-13 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello Aleksic: > > no nat on $extIF inet proto {tcp, udp} from $intIF:network to > $intIF2:network > no nat on $extIF inet proto {tcp, udp} from $intIF2:network to > $intIF:network > If nothing else, these rules won't match because the traffic isn't traversing the External Interface. no nat on $

RE: first firewall with pf

2009-03-24 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello: > # > #interfaces # > # > ext_if="bce0" > ext_if2="bce1" > I would also define your inside interface(s), not just your outside. Let's call it "bce2" for the example: int_if="bce2" > > # > #allow all connections fro

RE: Issues with PF and 7.1

2009-01-23 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello All: > > What does sysctl vm.kmem_size_max show? Try increasing that size a > > bit in loader.conf and see if that helps. > > Seconded. My guess is that the system flushes buffers when you first load the > tables due to memory pressure, so when you load the tables a second time there >

Issues with PF and 7.1

2009-01-22 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello All: We are having memory issues with PF and 7.1p2 that we didn't experience with 6.3. Here's what happens. # pfctl -f /usr/local/etc/pf.conf /usr/local/etc/pf.conf:135: cannot define table smtpd_reject_policyd: Cannot allocate memory /usr/local/etc/pf.conf:139: cannot define table smtp

Crazy Question - IPv6 to IPv4 and vice versa

2008-09-02 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello All: I'm wondering if it would be possible to create a mapping between an "outside" IPv6 address and an "inside" IPv4 NAT (or round-robin group, to take it to the next logical step) or vice versa? This would be on a FreeBSD 7.0 installation. As a second note, if it's not supported now w

RE: Confusion about FTP through PF

2008-03-06 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello Jeremy (et. al.): We found the issue and I wanted to share the solution. As before, this rule worked as expected: # -- pass in quick on $vlan2_if inet proto tcp from any to port { ftp, 49152:65535 } modulate state flags S/SA # -- However, when the following rule was in place, we couldn'

RE: Confusion about FTP through PF

2008-03-04 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello All: > pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to 72.20.106.8 port { > ftp, 49152:65535 } modulate state flags S/SA > Thanks to Jeremy for the line above which works like a champ. The last piece of the puzzle for me is to block all inbound ftp connections to servers other than m

Confusion about PF and FTP

2008-03-03 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello All: I am confused about using FTP through PF. We have been running with a working ftp-proxy setup that allows our internal servers to ftp out with no trouble. I am now interested in putting an FTP server behind my PF configuration and I've not been too successful. If I am running an F

Confusion about FTP through PF

2008-03-03 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello All: I am confused about using FTP through PF. We have been running with a working ftp-proxy setup that allows our internal servers to ftp out with no trouble. I am now interested in putting an FTP server behind my PF configuration and I've not been too successful. If I am running an F

RE: Rule doubt

2007-09-27 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello David: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Verzolla > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:25 AM > To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org > Subject: Rule doubt > > Hi All, > Its possible creates a rule that can match all t

RE: DMZ problem

2007-04-12 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello Vadym: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vadym Chepkov > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: DMZ problem > > Hello everyone, > > I earlier asked a question about Amanda, stil

PFSync Not Working Correctly

2007-02-06 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello All: I have two 6.2 RELEASE servers working in failover mode as PF Load Balancers. When the MASTER box is failed (through reboot or interface shutdown, etc.) the BACKUP box becomes MASTER as expected, but connections that existed through the MASTER before the failover do not transfer as exp