Re: Support for the enc(4) pseudo-interface

2017-03-21 Thread Marin Bernard
letting me know that the enc was available as a kernel module! Marin. 21 mars 2017 13:22 "Kristof Provost" a écrit: > On 21 Mar 2017, at 12:44, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > Kristof Provost wrote on 2017/03/21 10:18: > >> On 21 Mar 2017, at 9:43, Marin Bernard wrote:

Re: Support for the enc(4) pseudo-interface

2017-03-21 Thread Marin Bernard
Hi again Kristof, It appears you were right. ICMP flows through even with no rule set. I'm afraid I'll have to build a custom kernel. Thank you for your help, Marin. 21 mars 2017 10:18 "Kristof Provost" a écrit: > On 21 Mar 2017, at 9:43, Marin Bernard wrote: > &

Re: Support for the enc(4) pseudo-interface

2017-03-21 Thread Marin Bernard
ssible for a peer to ping another. As soon as IKE creates a SA, however, ping starts working. As you can see, the last rule is explicitely bound to the inexistent enc0 interface, and yet is working fine. Thanks, Marin. 21 mars 2017 03:30 "Kristof Provost" a écrit: > On 20 Ma

Re: Support for the enc(4) pseudo-interface

2017-03-20 Thread Marin Bernard
l does not support it. Is it expected behaviour? Is it safe to use such a configuration on a production machine ? Thanks, Marin. 20 mars 2017 14:20 "Marin Bernard" a écrit: > Hi all, > > I've just set up IPsec between two FreeBSD 11-RELEA

Support for the enc(4) pseudo-interface

2017-03-20 Thread Marin Bernard
Hi all, I've just set up IPsec between two FreeBSD 11-RELEASE hosts with  security/openiked. ___ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd