Re: pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Operation not supported by device

Hi, What do you mean be "clean rc.conf"?I'm facing this issue as well: pfctl: DIOCGETRULES: Permission denied using 10.1-RELEASE Thank you! On Thursday, November 24, 2011 9:16 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: On Nov 23, 2011, at 17:02, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: > Hi everyone, > > After

drop vs return

Hi, Which is your set block-policy? Drop or Return? And why? Cheers, Laszlo ___ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: referer filtering

Thank you Daniel! On Friday, September 26, 2014 1:51 PM, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:24:01AM -0700, Laszlo Danielisz via freebsd-pf wrote: > I was wondering how is possible to accept a connection, lets say on port 80 > only if it comes from a specified r

Re: referer filtering

pany:Smarty LLC mobile: 00994.51.927.11.99 mail: ja...@smarty.az web.mail:j.mustafa...@gmail.com •••/ On Sep 25, 2014 11:24 PM, Laszlo Danielisz via freebsd-pf wrote: > > Hi, > > I was wondering how is poss

referer filtering

Hi, I was wondering how is possible to accept a connection, lets say on port 80 only if it comes from a specified referer. Let's say there is a link on server A (IP 1.1.1.1) pointing to server B (IP 2.2.2.2). And server B will only accept the connection if it was sent by A. Any ideas? Thx! Las

Re: pf rules vs DHCP

I changed to fix address, so I don't have any more issues with that. @Kevin, yes I'm using interfaces, is there any what not using them in pf.conf? -- Laszlo Danielisz Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On 2012 December 2 Sunday at 12:04 AM, Kevin Wilcox wrote

pf rules vs DHCP

Hi Everybody, Today I just found out that my pf rules are not loaded on boot if I configure my machine's interface with DHCP, in case I go with the IP address set up on boot in rc.conf everything works properly. Has any of you met this issue before? -- Laszlo Danielisz Sent with Sp

Re: pfctl -s rules

Thank you! On 2012 November 30 Friday at 2:33 PM, Fleuriot Damien wrote: > -P > > Enjoy. > > > On Nov 30, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Laszlo Danielisz (mailto:laszlo_daniel...@yahoo.com)> wrote: > > Good idea, let me check. > > One more think, while pfctl -vn

Re: pfctl -s rules

names. > > > On Nov 30, 2012, at 2:17 PM, Laszlo Danielisz (mailto:laszlo_daniel...@yahoo.com)> wrote: > > Thank you very much for your help! > > > > pf is loaded to the kernel: > > ktulu# kldstat|grep pf > > 381 0xc4b41000 3000

Re: pfctl -s rules

ktulu# grep pf /etc/rc.conf #pf pf_enable="YES" pf_rules="/etc/pf.conf" pf_flags="" pflog_enable="YES" pflog_logfile="/var/log/pflog" pflog_flags="" I wonder why it doesn't start on boot time? -- Laszlo Danielisz Sent with Spa

Re: pfctl -s rules

Nothing is displayed ktulu# pfctl -nf /etc/pf.conf ktulu# -- Laszlo Danielisz Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On 2012 November 30 Friday at 12:02 PM, Fleuriot Damien wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Laszlo Danielisz (mailto:laszlo_daniel...@yah

pfctl -s rules

Hi Everybody, Recently I've discover the following issues: I can't display my firewalls rules, and the firewall is enabled. Take a look what is happening: ktulu# pfctl -s rules No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled ktulu# pfctl -e No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related fu