Re: pf synproxy

2010-07-28 Thread Justin
10 2:01 PM, Justin wrote: Ahh. That explains it then. I was operating under the assumption that the machine doing the synproxy would forge the reply such that the TARGET host would reply to the synproxy box, not its default gateway. As in 1.2.3.4 request to client 5.5.5.5 via -> 2.3.4.5, f

Re: pf synproxy

2010-07-28 Thread Justin
e? On 7/28/2010 1:22 PM, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 01:04:42PM -0700, Justin wrote: Logged to files and dumped; Outside: 19:58:09.571810 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 118, id 12726, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52) REMOTE_CLIENT.56270> TARGET_HOST.80: Flags [S],

Re: pf synproxy

2010-07-28 Thread Justin
12a8 creatorid: e7945cd2 Never gets beyond that. On 7/28/2010 12:06 AM, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:24:56PM -0700, Justin wrote: - tcpdumps showing the initial connect attempt (logs below were furhter along the process); external: 02:21:25.595977 IP (tos

Re: pf synproxy

2010-07-28 Thread Justin
12a8 creatorid: e7945cd2 Never gets beyond that. On 7/28/2010 12:06 AM, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:24:56PM -0700, Justin wrote: - tcpdumps showing the initial connect attempt (logs below were furhter along the process); external: 02:21:25.595977 IP (tos

Re: pf synproxy

2010-07-27 Thread Justin
s 0x0, ttl 118, id 22017, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40) On 7/27/2010 6:51 PM, Justin wrote: Hello Daniel, Didn't get any sort of information from pfctl -x misc. Here's the output from the commands you suggested; (3 SSH connections to run/log the tcpdump and

Re: pf synproxy

2010-07-27 Thread Justin
Hartmeier wrote: On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 05:26:21AM -0700, Justin wrote: When using synproxy state - the connection never completes. If we change synproxy to keep, everything works fine. Alternately, if the service in question is running locally on the actual firewall itself, I'll see state

Re: pf synproxy

2010-07-26 Thread Justin
... it's not an if_bridge, thanks. On 7/26/2010 7:05 AM, Denny Lin wrote: On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 05:26:21AM -0700, Justin wrote: Hello all - I've tried searching the list but it seems something is broken and I'm getting 500 errors. Alas, Is there something uni

pf synproxy

2010-07-26 Thread Justin
d and there appears to be no change. Is this a bug? Have I missed something totally obvious? -Justin ___ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Need a little PF help here, please...

2006-10-08 Thread Justin Franks
uick on rl0 proto tcp from to rl0 port 25 block in quick on rl0 proto tcp from to rl0 port 25 block in quick on rl0 proto tcp from to rl0 port 25 pass in on rl0 proto tcp from any to rl0 port 25 pass in on rl0 proto tcp from any to rl0 port 110 pass in on