stigating tomorrow.
Regards
Joe Jones
From: Kristof Provost
Sent: 01 March 2018 09:57:18
To: Joe Jones
Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Panic
On 1 Mar 2018, at 15:37, Joe Jones wrote:
> yes we use pfsync. Yesterday we tried with pfsync switched of
a single address rather than
a block of addresses the box does not crash.
We are following this line of investigation at the moment.
Regards
Joe Jones
On 01/03/18 09:57, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 1 Mar 2018, at 15:37, Joe Jones wrote:
yes we use pfsync. Yesterday we tried with pfsync switched
Hi Kristof,
yes we use pfsync. Yesterday we tried with pfsync switched off, the box
still locked up but this time without a panic.
We make the DIOCRADDADDRS ioctl on the master and the backup (we use
CARPed pairs).
Regards Joe Jones
On 01/03/18 03:00, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 28 Feb
igb_msix_que+0xee
we compiled with
options INVARIANTS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
options WITNESSoptions WITNESS_SKIPSPIN
options WITNESS_KDB
we went back to the 11.1 release as the relenge branch didn't compile
for us (probably our fault).
Regards
Joe Jone
directly by pf, but I'm guessing packet processing needs to be
thread safe in a way it didn't in 8.
Regards
Joe Jones
On 25/02/18 10:56, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 14 Feb 2018, at 19:57, Joe Jones wrote:
On 14/02/18 13:09, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 14 Feb 2018, at 23:47, Joe Jones
="2"
Next I'm going to start stripping parts out of our setup to try and get
to a system that is stable under the test load.
Can anyone shed any light on what is happening here.
Thanks
Joe Jones
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free s
