Kevin, good day.
Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 08:26:55PM +0800, Kevin Foo wrote:
> I recently setup a bridge box with inline cache proxy. if_bridge with
> pf filtering was working perfectly. However, squid-cache listening on
> loopback device did not get any packets from pf rdr. I have seen
> successful s
Gavin, good day.
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 02:06:50PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Synopsis: [patch] teach tcpdump(1) to cope with the new-style pflog(4) output
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: gavin
> State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 13 14:05:10 UTC 2008
> State-Changed-W
Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:24:46PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 04:48:43PM -0400, Tom Uffner wrote:
> > was this an accidental omission, as it appears to be since the rest
> > of the pf files including /etc/pf.os are included, or was it done by
> > design?
>
> By desig
Nate, good day.
Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:24:17PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> I have tried to achieve the same goal with a simpler patch. Here are
> the changes:
>
> Be sure to initialize the callout struct and other setup tasks before
> proceeding. Previously, machclk_freq could be set to a non-
Nate, Max, good day.
Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:04:23PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> This error can potentially be responsible to the weird bandwidth
> values I am having with the altq on my notebook. The issue is
> described on the thread
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/fre
Nate, good day.
Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:36:29AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >
> > Fine, thanks! So, you're happy with the way the problem was fixed?
> > I see that another function that uses tbr_callout is tbr_timeout,
> > but it will not be called before tbr_set. So it seems to me that
> > cal
Nate, Max, good day.
Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:26:09PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Fine, thanks! So, you're happy with the way the problem was fixed?
> I see that another function that uses tbr_callout is tbr_timeout,
> but it will not be called before tbr_set. So it se
Nate, good day.
Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:06:24AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > With my patch the problem goes away. Just checked ;))
>
> If this works for you, I'm ok with Max committing it.
Fine, thanks! So, you're happy with the way the problem was fixed?
I see that another function that uses
Max, good day.
Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 05:17:14PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> > I glanced over the new code and found that no changes were
> > introduced to the altq_subr.c. And there was rather old issue
> > I found in April: non-initialised callback due to Nate Lawson's
> > changes in handling the c
Max, good day.
Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:47:24AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> $subject at: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/PF41/
I glanced over the new code and found that no changes were
introduced to the altq_subr.c. And there was rather old issue
I found in April: non-initialised callback due to
Nate, *, good day.
Sorry for the previous posting: I had messed the things and posted
the old message to the list.
Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:27:26PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > > On the new code but without loading cpufreq and leaving the freq at 2200
> > > Mhz, do you get
Nate, good day.
Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 01:27:42AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> I am just using the defaults for the -CURRENT. Can not verify
> them now -- my -CURRENT is crashing with the modem link, so
> I am either writing mails or doing the tests, sorry.
OK, I had cured the modem
Nate,
Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 01:56:13PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > Yes, the numbers are perfectly correct. I will try to redo the
> > tests on Monday (when I will be able to use the LAN link) and
> > will watch for this debug information. Any other recommendations
> > are, of course, welcome.
>
Nate, good day!
Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:42:32PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > I see no difference between the -CURRENT from today and from 30th
> > March (I see that your commit was made at 26th of March, but I am
> > not sure that mu current was updated after it for the -CURRENT
> > compiled at 3
Nate, good day.
Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 05:56:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A few weeks ago, I committed a change to ALTQ that I was only able to
> compile-test. What I need is someone with a laptop or other
> cpufreq-capable system that is also using ALTQ to verify that with
> powerd runni
15 matches
Mail list logo
