https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230619
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Assignee|b...@freeb
On Tuesday, 14 August 2018 15:44:52 CEST Ermal Luçi wrote:
> If you really want to spend time on it, the best option is to pull out the
> pool concept used by the rules/nat... and manage it outside of the
> rules/states but in its own module referenced by the former ones.
Do you mean as separate
(sorry for the top post)
If you really want to spend time on it, the best option is to pull out the
pool concept used by the rules/nat... and manage it outside of the
rules/states but in its own module referenced by the former ones.
This would allow extensibility and propper reasoning about it.
On Tuesday, 14 August 2018 16:15:48 CEST Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2018, at 0:32, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
> > On Monday, 13 August 2018 17:59:15 CEST Kristof Provost wrote:
> > How about this?
> >
> > https://github.com/innogames/freebsd/commit/
> > d44a0d9487285fac8ed1d7372cc99cca83f
On 14 Aug 2018, at 0:32, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
On Monday, 13 August 2018 17:59:15 CEST Kristof Provost wrote:
How about this?
https://github.com/innogames/freebsd/commit/
d44a0d9487285fac8ed1d7372cc99cca83f616e6
That looks good to me.
There’s a few minor issues, things like inconsistent
