___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 07:08:10PM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2017, at 15:55, Marek Zarychta wrote:
> The problem description doesn’t ring any bells with me, but I’m also
> not sure
> I’ve fully understood it. Can you document a minimal reproduction
> scenario,
> with a pf.conf and
On 8 Jan 2017, at 15:55, Marek Zarychta wrote:
Is it a bug to be officially submitted or it will not be possible to
use
reply-to for UDP traffic anymore?
The problem description doesn’t ring any bells with me, but I’m also
not sure
I’ve fully understood it. Can you document a minimal reproduc
For a long period of time, I have been using reply-to rules for a few
TCP and one UDP service which had been introduced for HA reasons and are
used quite rarely.
After upgrade to 11-STABLE the rules for TCP traffic work as expected,
providing kind of symmetric routing, but UDP traffic ignores rep
