All,
I would like to get involved with PF development for FreeBSD. I use it at
home and have a background in C programming. How do I go about getting
involved?
I've got an extra machine or two that I could do testing with, so if you
could share your setups for testing bugfixes and whatnot then th
On 2012-Sep-09 20:53:42 +0300, wishmaster wrote:
>> Everyone agrees that altq needs to vanish, we know other code
>> exists/has been pondered; we'll see who might come forward.
>
> May be integrating pf with well-known dummynet?
I would also like to see this. I've used the pfSense work in this
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:57:16 +0200
claudiu vasadi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Mario Lobo wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 17:12:52 + (UTC)
> > Is it possible to explain (quickly, if you must) why altq needs to
> > vanish?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
>
>
> http://bsdly.blogspot.de
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:32:25AM -0700, Mark Atkinson wrote:
M> On 09/05/2012 11:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
M> > What's bad with "getting stuck" with old syntax? I personally don't
M> > have any problems with it. I have had problems with performance,
M> > however.
M>
M> Just as an aside is there a
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
--- Original message ---
From: "Ermal Lui"
To: "wishmaster"
Date: 10 September 2012, 10:08:03
Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] merging projects/pf into head
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:53 PM, wishmaster wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Everyone agrees that altq needs to vanish, we know other code
> >> e
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:53 PM, wishmaster wrote:
>
>
>> Everyone agrees that altq needs to vanish, we know other code
>> exists/has been pondered; we'll see who might come forward.
>
> May be integrating pf with well-known dummynet?
> ___
This alread
