Il 06/09/2012 13:54, Thomas Steen Rasmussen ha scritto:
On 06-09-2012 12:40, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Would this be of interest to anyone besides me ?
Hello,
Yes, I would be interested. Sounds very nice for large
rulesets that can get a bit unmanageable in one file.
If possible, please support
On 06-09-2012 12:40, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Would this be of interest to anyone besides me ?
Hello,
Yes, I would be interested. Sounds very nice for large
rulesets that can get a bit unmanageable in one file.
If possible, please support wildcard inclusion like:
"include /etc/pf/customers/*.con
Hello list,
Is there any interest regarding the support of includes in PF's configuration ?
As in:
include /etc/pf/interfaces
include /etc/pf/timers
include /etc/pf/tables
...
I for one would dearly love such functionality.
In the meantime, I have taken to splitting our rulesets at work int
Ermal,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:09:23PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> Its good to see results on your work and is good moving forward.
E> Claiming better behavior, under DoS or other comparison without showing any
data
E> or technical reason is a bit over this RFC.
Benchmark by authors are alw
