On 21. Jan 2012, at 23:26 , Greg Hennessy wrote:
>>>
>> There is one catch.
>> FreeBSD does not want to break compatibility of old syntax and that is why
>> i did not port the latest version of pf(4).
>
> Shades of the versioning/maintenance issues surrounding putting Perl in the
> base way ba
> >
> There is one catch.
> FreeBSD does not want to break compatibility of old syntax and that is why
> i did not port the latest version of pf(4).
Shades of the versioning/maintenance issues surrounding putting Perl in the
base way back in the day.
> What is there now makes it 'trivial' to go
The following reply was made to PR kern/163208; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?=
Cc: Fabian Keil ,
bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/163208: [pf] PF state key linking mismatch
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:01
On 21. Jan 2012, at 20:52 , Tilman Keskinöz wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2012, at 21:01 , Fabian Keil wrote:
>
>> Tilman Keskinöz wrote:
>>
>>> Same here.
>>>
>>> Also Fabian Keil reported this in
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-July/025696.html
>>
>> This has been fixe
The following reply was made to PR kern/163208; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?=
To: Fabian Keil
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/163208: [pf] PF state key linking mismatch
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:52:09 +0100
On Jan 21
On Jan 21, 2012, at 21:01 , Fabian Keil wrote:
> Tilman Keskinöz wrote:
>
>> Same here.
>>
>> Also Fabian Keil reported this in
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-July/025696.html
>
> This has been fixed in CURRENT shortly thereafter:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/piperma
The following reply was made to PR kern/163208; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Fabian Keil
To: Tilman =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Keskin=F6z?=
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/163208: [pf] PF state key linking mismatch
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:01:18 +0100
--Sig_/aS
Tilman Keskinöz wrote:
> Same here.
>
> Also Fabian Keil reported this in
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-July/025696.html
This has been fixed in CURRENT shortly thereafter:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2011-July/006199.html
Maybe the fix hasn't been
The following reply was made to PR kern/163208; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?=
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org
Cc: freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de
Subject: Re: kern/163208: [pf] PF state key linking mismatch
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:40:36 +
Same here.
Also Fabian Keil reported this in
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-July/025696.html
Any ideas?
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Walt Elam wrote:
> I would like to help with the development of the PF port for FreeBSD but am
> not quite sure how to get involved. More specifically, I would like to help
> get something ported over that accepts the new rule syntax since it becomes
> increasing
W dniu 19.01.2012 17:32, Adam PAPAI pisze:
Bartek W. aka Mastier wrote:
Indeed. The default maximum is 10 000 states as I remember.
I.e. one of the main routers in my case. core quad.
set limit { states 30, frags 1, src-nodes 10 }
I had the states up to 25 but the frags an
12 matches
Mail list logo
