So it looks likeI can comment out this code in
/usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf.c:
/* mismatch. must not happen. */
printf("pf: state key linking mismatch! dir=%s, "
"if=%s, stored af=%u, a0: ",
dir == PF_OUT ? "OUT" : "IN", k
On 12. Jan 2012, at 22:26 , Matt Lager wrote:
> Interesting. I feel like the performance is degraded quite a bit between two
> VPN points that display these messages vs. two VPN points that don't display
> these messages, though I could be wrong. Is your basic suggestion to not
> consider this
Interesting. I feel like the performance is degraded quite a bit between
two VPN points that display these messages vs. two VPN points that don't
display these messages, though I could be wrong. Is your basic
suggestion to not consider this a concern and continue forward with my
VPN rollouts?
On 12. Jan 2012, at 21:07 , Matt Lager wrote:
> I've had a bug report in on this for a while but hasn't received a response
> yet, also posted to the FreeBSD forums and haven't received a response
> either, see these links:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/163208
> http://fo
I've had a bug report in on this for a while but hasn't received a
response yet, also posted to the FreeBSD forums and haven't received a
response either, see these links:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/163208
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28278
I don't believe it
The following reply was made to PR kern/163208; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Matt Lager
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, mla...@sdunix.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/163208: [pf] PF state key linking mismatch
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:58:31 -0700
This problem persists once I updated to 9.0-RELEA