On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Andrew Daugherity
wrote:
> Summary: devd unnecessarily reconfigures carp interfaces, and
> "/etc/rc.d/netif start carp0" loses the advskew setting when an IP
> assigned to carp0 is configured on gif0. This is probably two
> separate bugs.
Well, since I seem to ha
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 15:10:04 Artis Caune wrote:
> 2009/2/25 Max Laier :
> > Hello Artis,
> >
> > looks like a valid catch to me. I'm CC'ing the upstream maintainer (Bob,
> > that's you, right?) From a quick glance there is also a minor leak in
> > readsuffixlists in the goto bad case.
* Bob Beck [2009-02-25 08:52]:
>
>
> * Max Laier [2009-02-25 06:43]:
> > Hello Artis,
> >
> > looks like a valid catch to me. I'm CC'ing the upstream maintainer (Bob,
> > that's you, right?) From a quick glance there is also a minor leak in
> > readsuffixlists in the goto bad case.
>
>
* Max Laier [2009-02-25 06:43]:
> Hello Artis,
>
> looks like a valid catch to me. I'm CC'ing the upstream maintainer (Bob,
> that's you, right?) From a quick glance there is also a minor leak in
> readsuffixlists in the goto bad case.
Yeah you're right max, in fact there are three
2009/2/25 Max Laier :
> Hello Artis,
>
> looks like a valid catch to me. I'm CC'ing the upstream maintainer (Bob,
> that's you, right?) From a quick glance there is also a minor leak in
> readsuffixlists in the goto bad case.
>
I'm running spamd with this patch more than 2h and no leaks :)
-
Hello Artis,
looks like a valid catch to me. I'm CC'ing the upstream maintainer (Bob,
that's you, right?) From a quick glance there is also a minor leak in
readsuffixlists in the goto bad case.
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 13:35:29 Artis Caune wrote:
> we are running spamd-4.1.2 on amd64 box
Hi,
we are running spamd-4.1.2 on amd64 boxes for a week now and one of
it's processes are getting bigger and bigger:
spamd: (pf update) (spamd)
SIZE: 836M
RES: 773M
we use redundant firewalls and they have the same problem.
grey count is 500'000 - 1'000'000
white count is 80'000 and gr
On 2009-Feb-13 16:58:39 -0200, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>if you get to use pf+dummynet for real please broadcast. I once searched
>for it but no luck in finding :)
I'm using it at work to do WAN simulation for system testing. The
patches are a but rough around the edges but mostly work. The major
c
