Hi all,
I've been running pf+obspamd on FBSD 6.2-RELEASE.
I appear to be blocking some addresses that appear in my spamd-mywhite file
and I don't understand why that would be the case here. I'm guessing I've
screwed up my pf.conf file.
Here's my config file:
# pfctl -vvnf /etc/pf.conf
ext_if =
On 9/6/07, Gergely CZUCZY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've got a configuration when i've got 2 IPs on em0
> from the very same subnet. This means, they have the
> same broadcast address.
ifconfig(8) suggests:
alias Establish an additional network address for this interface. This
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Bill Marquette wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another way to go is setting the queuelength for the internal
> > processing queue to something insanely high (1000+). This will most
> > likely work around the problem at the cost of burning
Hello
I've got a configuration when i've got 2 IPs on em0
from the very same subnet. This means, they have the
same broadcast address. I have the following rule
in my pf.conf:
block in quick on $if_inet proto udp from any to $if_inet:broadcast port 137
label "broadcast deny"
Since I've got two a
> First, my setup - (NB, all servers mentioned are running
> 6-STABLE)
...
> # options for pf and spamd
> pf_enable="YES"
> pfspamd_enable="YES"
> pfspamd_flags="-g -v -p 8025"
> pfspamlogd_enable="YES"
I currently run FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p7.
Checking,
grep PORTVERSION= /usr/ports/mail/spamd
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Gavin Cooper wrote:
> tablepersist file "/usr/local/etc/spamd-mywhite"
The table is not used in your provided pf.conf.
I don't think this is related to your problem though.
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
