On 5/16/07, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
em0 and bge0
em2 and bce0
em3 and bce1
Do all the interface names have to match on the HA pair?
Yes they do - but that is only if you use an if-bound state-policy,
which isn't default.
Keep in mind also that states also have a direction associa
David DeSimone wrote:
Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to the diagram that Greg sent a link to state is checked for
every interface. However is the state information tied to an
interface?
The answer is determined by the state-policy. In your configuration you
can set state-poli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> According to the diagram that Greg sent a link to state is checked for
> every interface. However is the state information tied to an
> interface?
The answer is determined by the state-policy. In your configu
David DeSimone wrote:
Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a question about the number of times a packet passes through pf
on a router.
The PF subsystem always examines every packet that passes in or out an
interface. For a forwarded packet that means it will be examined twice.
Howeve
>
> Does a packet being routed from em0 to em1 pass through PF twice?
>
PF does both ingress and egress filtering, this explains it far better than
I could.
http://homepage.mac.com/quension/pf/flow.png
>
> pass in quick on em0 proto tcp from 172.31.0.0/24 to 172.31.1.0/24 port
> 22 keep st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a question about the number of times a packet passes through pf
> on a router.
The PF subsystem always examines every packet that passes in or out an
interface. For a forwarded packet that means it wil
Hi,
I have a question about the number of times a packet passes through pf
on a router.
Take the following simple configuration
172.31.0.1/24:em0-[FreeBSD Router]-em1:172.31.1.1/24
Does a packet being routed from em0 to em1 pass through PF twice?
Would the following example work to only pas
On 12/23/-58 20:59, Henry wrote:
> I'm running PF.
> - I have an IP Phone here that uses the 3com NBX phone system.
> - Residential cable broadband connection with dynamic IP.
>
> When I use binat, the phone works 100%.
>
> When I use NAT with redirects to forward, the phone works partially.
> So
