Re: problem with linux kernel 2.16.18.2 and packet filter

2007-03-20 Thread Jon Simola
On 3/20/07, WAYNE KING <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello list, My subnet at Ohio State is running a BSD firewall with packet filter. It works great, but I just encountered a weird problem with the linux 2.16.18.2 kernel and packet filter. Any quick insights just for my own education? A quick

Re: problem with linux kernel 2.16.18.2 and packet filter

2007-03-20 Thread Max Laier
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 18:42, WAYNE KING wrote: > Hello list, My subnet at Ohio State is running a BSD firewall with > packet filter. It works great, but I just encountered a weird problem > with the linux 2.16.18.2 kernel and packet filter. When the firewall > was on I could do absolutely nothin

problem with linux kernel 2.16.18.2 and packet filter

2007-03-20 Thread WAYNE KING
Hello list, My subnet at Ohio State is running a BSD firewall with packet filter. It works great, but I just encountered a weird problem with the linux 2.16.18.2 kernel and packet filter. When the firewall was on I could do absolutely nothing via the web; every page would hang. As soon as I turn

Re: pf logging differences

2007-03-20 Thread Eric
Volker wrote: On 12/23/-58 20:59, Eric wrote: in this case, pf logging looks like this: Why is the first host producing more detailed logs? why isnt pf showing the port that was blocked or anything else like it does in the first host? Is there a way to make the ng0 interface log more or is thi

Re: pf logging differences

2007-03-20 Thread Volker
On 12/23/-58 20:59, Eric wrote: > in this case, pf logging looks like this: > > # > tcpdump -ei pflog0 > # > tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned > # > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode > # > listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD p