Re: pf starts, but no rules

2007-02-10 Thread Kian Mohageri
On 2/10/07, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks, Yesterday I rebooted a server to load a new kernel. After the reboot, the firewall rules were not loaded. $ grep pf /etc/rc.conf pf_enable="YES" pflog_enable="YES" pf_rules="/etc/pf.rules" I never checked for the rules until today

pf starts, but no rules

2007-02-10 Thread Dan Langille
Hi folks, Yesterday I rebooted a server to load a new kernel. After the reboot, the firewall rules were not loaded. $ grep pf /etc/rc.conf pf_enable="YES" pflog_enable="YES" pf_rules="/etc/pf.rules" I never checked for the rules until today and found this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ sudo pfctl

Re: debug.mpsafenet=1 vs. user/group rules [Re: kern/106805: ...]

2007-02-10 Thread Max Laier
Hello, after 6 weeks in HEAD I have received ZERO additional feedback! Does anyone (other than avatar) care? On Friday 29 December 2006 15:18, Max Laier wrote: > I just put this in HEAD, a diff to RELENG_6 is attached. Please follow > avatar's example and test and report back! > > Just apply a

Re: SPAMD stop passing mail from WHITE-list

2007-02-10 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I haven't found a way to use that mechanism to block such hosts for, > say 120 minutes (which would be a great feature). pfctl is in the process of growing an expire feature (in OpenBSD-current now, in all likelihood part of the OpenBSD 4.1 release), but timed