Re: kern/102647: Using pf stateful rules for inet6 fails for connections originating from the firewall itself to a service running on thesame box

2006-09-08 Thread Max Laier
Synopsis: Using pf stateful rules for inet6 fails for connections originating from the firewall itself to a service running on thesame box State-Changed-From-To: patched->closed State-Changed-By: mlaier State-Changed-When: Sat Sep 9 00:50:45 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: Committed, thanks. http:/

Re: TRansparent firewalll (pf vs ipfw)

2006-09-08 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 08 September 2006 16:56, Mircea Popescu wrote: > I have an Freebsd 6.0 box with a functioning bridge (bridge0 = fxp0 + > rl0) > > My problem is that if I try to cut access to any port on bridge0 > interface using PF, nothing happens. > > For example I've tried to cut access to ssh service

TRansparent firewalll (pf vs ipfw)

2006-09-08 Thread Mircea Popescu
Hi! I have an Freebsd 6.0 box with a functioning bridge (bridge0 = fxp0 + rl0) My problem is that if I try to cut access to any port on bridge0 interface using PF, nothing happens. For example I've tried to cut access to ssh service from a certain ip ... putty still managed to get through. The

Re: NEW IDEAS

2006-09-08 Thread Bill Marquette
On 9/8/06, Rajkumar S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/8/06, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 07 September 2006 20:21, KES wrote: > > Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>KES wrote: > > >> How about 'ALTQ' node? or may be 'queue' node > > >> for packets scheduling > Th