>
> Thanks for your answer but what do you think of using ipfw
> for routing policy and pf for firewalling, is it possible ?
With two active packet filters in the system, I would not like to be the one
trying to debug problems.
One can do policy based routing in PF using route-to.
Greg
__
On Thursday 22 June 2006 17:53, Sébastien AVELINE wrote:
> I would like to have some advises on pf. I'd like to use pf for
> clustering a firewall and using pfsync.
> Actually I use a Linux Box to do this. The problem is that I have
> specific rules for routing with iproute2 because I got a lot of
Thanks for your answer but what do you think of using ipfw for routing
policy and pf for firewalling, is it possible ?
Huzeyfe Onal a écrit :
Hi,
you can use PF's route-to options for Policy routing..
On 6/22/06, Sébastien AVELINE [1]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
you can use PF's route-to options for Policy routing..
On 6/22/06, Sébastien AVELINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have some advises on pf. I'd like to use pf for
clustering a firewall and using pfsync.
Actually I use a Linux Box to do this. The problem is that I have
sp
Hi,
I would like to have some advises on pf. I'd like to use pf for
clustering a firewall and using pfsync.
Actually I use a Linux Box to do this. The problem is that I have
specific rules for routing with iproute2 because I got a lot of
different subnets with multi-homing. It seems that freeb
