Does FreeBSD have any list of differences between pf and OpenBSD's pf?
Or does it all work and behave the same (at least up to last version
imported)? (So same version of PF behaves the same on both platforms?)
Or should I look at all the differences in pf up to OpenBSD's 3.8 version?
It looks
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 12:50:57AM +0100, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> Is there by any chance work being done on pf to include functionality
> that is present in FreeBSD ipfw, that checks if packet entered
> router via correct interface as pointed out by routing table?
Not that I know of, no.
Danie
Hi,
This feature will help to mitigate DoS atttacks, I vote for :-)
verrevpath & versrcreach are references to Cisco Revers Path
Forwarding algorithm and was first time cited in RFC1812.
I would add that, AFAIK, the partial implementation, antispoof,
(which is unable to make the distinction be
Hi all,
Is there by any chance work being done on pf to include functionality
that is present in FreeBSD ipfw, that checks if packet entered
router via correct interface as pointed out by routing table?
I know there is antispoof, but it's simple check of connected network
and interface address,
Hello, freebsd-pf.
Is there any way to make pf, generate reports including srcip and bytes
for rules like "pass in log-all quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $me port
80"?
--
Roman Gorohov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
