Hi Daniel & Jeremie
I have already closed this theme last week!
Just answered on the yesterday's message.
I enough for a long time use PF and squid and in general I cope with blocking
of that that I want.
If developers consider that this functionality will negatively affect
reliability and sa
>
> Sorry for being rude, but you went too far this time.
>
You weren't rude Jeremie, I would have been even less charitable but you
beat me to it.
Greg
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-p
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:20:13PM +0400, alex-bsd wrote:
> Presence this function in IPTABLES is very convenient for them.
I'm not sure, but could it be that you over-estimate 'convenience' in
this case?
Because it appears to be rather simple to add a http proxy to the mix
which solves the pro
Hi Alex,
> I not absolutely understand, how we can play with Daniel.
> In the work I do not use Linux.
> Many my friends use Linux as gateway.
> Presence this function in IPTABLES is very convenient for them.
> This function IPTABLES is used by them enough for a long time, any
> problems connect
I not absolutely understand, how we can play with Daniel.
In the work I do not use Linux.
Many my friends use Linux as gateway.
Presence this function in IPTABLES is very convenient for them.
This function IPTABLES is used by them enough for a long time, any problems
connected with use of this o
> I did not succeed with this question with the main questions list.
>
> I would like to use natd with packet filter under FreeBSD 5.4.
>
One has to ask *why* ? When pf comes with inbuilt address translation.
Greg
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org maili
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 15:28, Michael Dexter wrote:
> I would like to use natd with packet filter under FreeBSD 5.4.
Why? What does natd provide that PF's internal NAT engine does not?
Note that PF does not provide any means of using divert sockets. In order to
use natd you have to use IPFW
Hello,
I did not succeed with this question with the main questions list.
I would like to use natd with packet filter under FreeBSD 5.4.
The rc.conf man page states that I want: natd_enable="YES" and that
"if the kernel was not built with options IPDIVERT, the ipdivert.ko
kernel module will
Hi Alberto,
> Does PF NAT have support for DNS ALG as described in
> RFC 2694 - DNS extensions to "Network Address
> Translators" (changing IP addresses in DNS payloads
> for certain DNS traffic types based on NAT entries)?
AFAIK, no, this is not supported, and this is not planned to be.
> If n
Hi all,
Does PF NAT have support for DNS ALG as described in
RFC 2694 - DNS extensions to "Network Address
Translators" (changing IP addresses in DNS payloads
for certain DNS traffic types based on NAT entries)?
If not, what is the PF recommended way for avoiding
issues with DNS/NAT when the DNS
> Hi,
> Here is simple explanation :
> This is my pf.conf
>
> extif="{ ed0 }"
> extip="{ (ed0) }"
> table { 192.168.1.0/24 }
> nat on $extif from to any -> $extip pass all
The syntax for the nat statement above doesn't look right.
> I want to ping from my lan stations to a public dns serve
11 matches
Mail list logo
