Hi Folks,
So, the Open Solaris folks released their OS micro benchmarks and I
have hacked (in the best and worst way of saying that) the code to run
on FreeBSD -CURRENT. I have only just tried this on a nightly build
that it less than a week old. There isn't a lot of documentation at:
http://ww
At Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:51:33 -0400,
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Very nice. There seems to be good coverage of common tasks, and the
> ability to save and compare multiple datasets via the tool which
> generates HTML makes understanding the results relatively easy. It
> would be quite interesting to co
y and performance relating to direct dispatch, I would
> appreciate any help.
>
One thing I would caution, though I have no proof nor have I made any
tests (yes, I know, bad gnn), is that I would expect this change to
degrade non-network performance when the network is under load. This
kind o
At Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:05:17 -0200,
Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>Recently i uncovered libmicro work in freebsd, but after
> install from ports
> my first test using pthread_create not work.
>
> Using default or custom parameters in pthread_create i see this messages
>
At Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs
> with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the
> first results. The first tests are for serving up static data.
Thanks very much for thi
You should try ports/net/netpipe which has the nice side effect of
shoving different message sizes across, and tends to show lots of
interesting performance issues.
Best,
George
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
At Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:06:39 -0400,
Josh Carroll wrote:
>
> I decided to do some testing of concurrent processes (rather than a
> single process that's multi-threaded). Specifically, I ran 4 ffmpeg
> (without the -threads option) commands at the same time. The
> difference was less than a percent:
At Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:13:07 +0200,
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> After playing with many settings and testing various configuration, now
> I'm able to to receive on bridge more then 800,000 packets/s
> without errors, which is amazing!
> Unfortunately the server behind bridge can't h
At Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:49:14 +0100,
Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > This is coming along very nicely indeed!
> >
> > One suggestion I have is that as more metrics are added it becomes
> > important for an "at a glance" overview of changes so we can monitor for
> > perf
At Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:08:13 +1000,
Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> I have a project with 3 workstations all needing high speed access to
> about 6Tb of storage. In the past I've installed technology such as
> fibre channel connected SAN storage (using Apple's xsan) for up to a
> dozen worksta
At Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:02:33 +1000,
Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
>
> On 15/04/2008, at 10:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am working with the Chelsio hardware and it seems to be well
> > supported on FreeBSD. All the machines in that system are FreeBSD
> > though. How do you intend to get
At Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:02:22 +0100,
Attilio Rao wrote:
>
> pmcannotate is a tool that prints out sources of a tool (in C or
> assembly) with inlined profiling informations retrieved by a prior
> pmcstat analysis.
> If compared with things like callgraph generation, it prints out
> profiling on a p
At Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:15:00 -0800,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> Laurent Frigault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I try to use hwpmc to find a net/lagg performance problem on a DELL
> > poweredge 2950 with dual E5440 (AMD64 7.1-PRERELEASE form yesterday) ,
> > but it seems that those processor are not recogni
13 matches
Mail list logo
