At 01:15 08/07/2011, you wrote:
On Jul 7, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> This is quibbling. On heavy loads on networ, disk et cetera,
isn't there always and also a CPU bound load?
No. Properly written software blocks when waiting on network or
disk I/O, and doesn't sit there spinnin
At 17:02 18/10/2011, Adrian Chadd wrote:
What is FBFS?
It's the freebsd port of the Brain Fuck Scheduler. It's not strictly
a port because Ivan Voras and the GSoC student made some changes on
the algorithm.
Adrian
___
freebsd-performance@freebs
At 17:45 18/10/2011, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
Ð Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:30:22 +0100
Vincent Hoffman пиÑеÑ:
> On 18/10/2011 16:24, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > Ð Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:02:47 +0800
> > Adrian Chadd пиÑеÑ:
> >
> >> What is FBFS?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Adrian
> > :)
> > http://rudot.blo
At 12:21 24/10/2011, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 21/10/2011 08:30, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> As I'm not a developer, but for scientific purposes highly interested in
> using GPUs, the only way of doing HPC computing at the moment is with
> nVidias TESLA/nVidia consumer graphics cards and LINUX, since on Lin
At 19:26 17/11/2011, you wrote:
Hello everyone I just had a few questions about ZFS.
Question 3:
Anyone Recommend for MySQL server? (Performance)
A short comment about databases. With ZFS and similar file systems,
when you make a snapshot the file system is recoverable/congruent/ok,
but the
At 11:33 18/11/2011, István wrote:
No problem for the most of the MySQL DBAs
because consistency is not in their dictionary anyway :)
I mean that surely db will be corrupted and
nothing could be recovered. I know postgresql and
there you have a begin snapshot - end snapshot
for this topic,
At 14:26 17/12/2011, you wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to share some of our expreience with PostgreSQL on FreeBSD.
It has been a while ago since we had to stop using FreeBSD for our
customer's PostgreSQL servers.
PostgreSQL (8.4 and 9.0) was demonstrating slow performance under heavy
loads a
At 12:36 09/03/2012, you wrote:
Sorry if you feel boring by those messages, but soem of us still get wet
eyes when it comes to OpenCL and LLVm (LLVM is supposed to become soon
the backend compiler in FreeBSD, as I understand). On PHORONIX I read
this message days ago:
http://www.phoronix.com/sca
At 19:16 09/03/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 9 March 2012 09:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Well, having to pick up existing ideas and incarntions of those for
> Linux is always a pain in the ass, but necessary at the moment. The
> "experts" neglected long time the need for keeping FBSD on par with KMS
At 02:02 15/12/2011, O. Hartmann wrote:
Just read this on
phoronix.com
Is this finally a chance to get GPGPU on FreeBSD natively supported?
nVidia has a binary driver, supporting well their higher end graphics
cards on FreeBSD 64bit natively.
I do not understand much about the compiler itself
At 20:23 29/03/2012, you wrote:
Ð Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:02:03 +0100
"O. Hartmann" пиÑеÑ:
> Just read this on
>
> phoronix.com
>
> Is this finally a chance to get GPGPU on FreeBSD natively supported?
>
> nVidia has a binary driver, supporting well their higher end graphics
> cards on FreeBSD
11 matches
Mail list logo
