ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Florian Smeets
[current@ bcc'ed to get a wider audience, please discuss on performance@] Hi, in recent times i saw a lot of threads where it was suggested people should switch from the ULE to the 4BSD scheduler. That got me thinking and i decided to run a few benchmarks. I looked through all the stuff Kris and

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/28/2012 14:40, Florian Smeets wrote: > The results are available in this Google docs spreadsheet, if you > scroll down there are also some nice graphs. > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ai0N1xDe3uNAdDRxcVFiYjNMSnJWOTZhUWVWWlBlem

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Florian Smeets
On 29.01.12 01:56, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/28/2012 14:40, Florian Smeets wrote: >> The results are available in this Google docs spreadsheet, if you >> scroll down there are also some nice graphs. > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ai0N1xDe3uNAdDRxcVFiYjNMSnJWOTZhUWVWWlBlemc > >

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Mark Linimon
Thank you for doing this work. mcl ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Florian Smeets wrote: > [current@ bcc'ed to get a wider audience, please discuss on performance@] > > Hi, > > in recent times i saw a lot of threads where it was suggested people > should switch from the ULE to the 4BSD scheduler. That got me thinking > and i deci