At Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:02:33 +1000,
Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
>
> On 15/04/2008, at 10:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am working with the Chelsio hardware and it seems to be well
> > supported on FreeBSD. All the machines in that system are FreeBSD
> > though. How do you intend to get
Greetings,
Benjeman J. Meekhof wrote:
Hi Aristedes,
We are/were testing FreeBSD on a Dell PE2950 with a Myricom 10GB
PCI-Express copper CX card. The driver seems mature. In tests out of
the box, I only saw about 3Gbps from iperf (testing against a linux
system...and maybe there are other i
Benjeman J. Meekhof wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted earlier about some results with this same system using UFS2.
> Now trying to test ZFS. This is a Dell PE2950 with two Perc6
> controllers and 4 md1000 disk shelves with 750GB drives. 16GB RAM, dual
> quad core Xeon. I recompiled our kernel to use the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:02:33AM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> On 15/04/2008, at 10:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I am working with the Chelsio hardware and it seems to be well
> >supported on FreeBSD. All the machines in that system are FreeBSD
> >though. How do you intend to get
Neterion supports OS X on 10GbE NICs, I think Intel does as well (via
third party).
Leonid
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kip Macy
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 5:09 PM
> To: Aristedes Maniatis; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
fr
Sure, here is an example iozone output when I tested UFS2. Same
hardware config as with ZFS test.
#gstripe label -v -s 128k test /dev/mfid0 /dev/mfid2
#newfs -U -b 65536 /dev/stripe/test
"Throughput report Y-axis is type of test X-axis is number of processes"
"Record size = 512 Kbytes "
"Outp
Benjeman Meekhof wrote:
Sure, here is an example iozone output when I tested UFS2. Same
hardware config as with ZFS test.
#gstripe label -v -s 128k test /dev/mfid0 /dev/mfid2
#newfs -U -b 65536 /dev/stripe/test
"Throughput report Y-axis is type of test X-axis is number of processes"
"Record
Ivan Voras wrote:
Per my discussion with Scott Long Can you repeat the test for UFS, but
create gstripe with a really small stripe size, like 4 KB?
Actually, no need to do that - it looks like iozone is doing quite
random IO ops so it won't help you.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
I have some old dd numbers from when I was experimenting to find a
UFS/gstripe combination that wasn't horrifyingly slow to read. I was
not then adjusting filesystem blocksize, and not until moving UFS2 bs to
the maximum did initial results seem worth resuming iozone tests. Raid
HW stripe-wi
