> here are ktrace results for supersmack and mysqld from a dualcore opteron box
> running select smack with 100 threads and 1 queries
> os: fbsd 6.1 prerelease
>
> syscall stats for supersmack
> number of syscalls captured: 42575687
> individual syscalls counts:
>read 32914539
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Sven Petai wrote:
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 21:52, Mike Silbersack wrote:
If you're willing to spend more time looking at this, I suggest that you
run truss or ktrace on the super-smack processes. I did a small amount of
mysql vs postgres vs firebird benchmarking two yea
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 21:52, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> If you're willing to spend more time looking at this, I suggest that you
> run truss or ktrace on the super-smack processes. I did a small amount of
> mysql vs postgres vs firebird benchmarking two years ago for a class
> project, and not
I'm not subscribed to -performance, hence why this isn't a true reply...
I noticed that Steve said:
---
Looking at this on a dual box here ( waiting for the new MB for dual dual
core )
All the time is spent processing super-smack and only 25% on mysqld.
---
If you're willing to spend more ti
