Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
I'm using my laptop to run ab in both test, and 2 totally different
servers :) That's why I do not pretend that the benchmark is done the
right way.
The linux host is with pentium 4 single core processor, The freebsd
host is a
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
I'm using my laptop to run ab in both test, and 2 totally different servers
:) That's why I do not pretend that the benchmark is done the right way.
The linux host is with pentium 4 single core processor, The freebsd host is
amd64 athlon 3200+ (2GHz
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Can you make this test with default /manual/ alias instead of file.txt,
> so we can compare results ?
Sorry, I currently need that server as-is and I've deleted the manuals
some time ago (since I don't need them there). It would probably be
easier for you to create a dummy
Hi,
Ivan Voras wrote:
Cheffo wrote:
What else I can change/test to improve performance?
First you'll have to give more info about the hardware on both systems,
and the way you benchmarked them (e.g. did you benchmark over ethernet
or from the same machine?). There are also a bunch of
Cheffo wrote:
> What else I can change/test to improve performance?
First you'll have to give more info about the hardware on both systems,
and the way you benchmarked them (e.g. did you benchmark over ethernet
or from the same machine?). There are also a bunch of things that may
make apache go f
Hello,
I'm running simple benchmark, ab (freebsd) -> apache 1.3.37 (freebsd)
and ab (freebsd) -> apache 1.3.34 (linux)
I do not pretend that the benchmark is accurate :) and do not really
care about results in linux, but they are here just for comparison.
ab -t 30 -c 100 http://boar.cmotd.com
