Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Simon Dircks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 8:27 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Peter Losher; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Ted Mittelstaedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Dircks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 8:27 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Peter Losher; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
>
>
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Losher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 10:18 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Yeah, ISC just hates FreeBSD
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Losher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 10:18 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
>
>
> Yeah, ISC j
> > * I am trying to understand what is different about the ISC
> > configuration but have not yet found the cause.
> It's called "Anti-FreeBSD bias". You won't find anything.
If this is true, please try to explain to me the following:
- ISC hosts 5 Netra 1s that comprise most of our sparc64 p
On 29/02/2008, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Device drivers and hardware are a cooperative effort. The ideal
> is a well-written device driver and well-designed hardware.
> Unfortunately the reality of it appears to be that it costs
> a LOT more money to hire good silicon de
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
My beef with the DNS tests was that ISC ran out and bought
the hardware FIRST, -then- they started testing. This is
directly contrary to every bit of advice ever given in
the computer industry for the last 50 years - you select
the software FIRST, -then- you buy the hard
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris
> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 6:21 PM
> To: Adrian Chadd
> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD
> Is there a way to tell from dmesg or pciconf that something is
> PCIe rather than PCI? The onboard stuff could be either.
The secret appears to be
pciconf -l -v | grep -i express
device = 'BCM5750A1 NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express'
This bge(4) Broadcom chip had problems in 6.
At 03:52 AM 3/3/2008, Thomas Krause (Webmatic) wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon has fixed a lot of driver issues (i.e. re(4), bfr(4), vr(4))
over the last few months, many are already in CURRENT or RELENG_7 (not
sure how many of them made it into 7.0-RELEASE) or posted as patches
to the current@ mailing li
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:52:22AM +0100, Thomas Krause (Webmatic) wrote:
> >>
> >
> >Pyun YongHyeon has fixed a lot of driver issues (i.e. re(4), bfr(4), vr(4))
> >over the last few months, many are already in CURRENT or RELENG_7 (not
> >sure how many of them made it into 7.0-RELEASE) or posted as
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My question is: which other PCI-Express GBit NIC's then Intel's are
> > available on the market? I can't find others ...
>
> "man -k pcie" on 6.2 gives:
AFAIK, PCIe devices show up as PCI devices to most drivers. I know that
> My question is: which other PCI-Express GBit NIC's then Intel's are
> available on the market? I can't find others ...
"man -k pcie" on 6.2 gives:
bce(4) - Broadcom NetXtreme II (BCM5706/BCM5708) PCI/PCIe Gigabit Ethernet
adapter driver
re(4) - RealTek 8139C+/8169/816xS/811xS/8101E PCI/PCIe E
Pyun YongHyeon has fixed a lot of driver issues (i.e. re(4), bfr(4), vr(4))
over the last few months, many are already in CURRENT or RELENG_7 (not
sure how many of them made it into 7.0-RELEASE) or posted as patches
to the current@ mailing list.
My question is: which other PCI-Express GBit NI
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Chris wrote:
Ironically the latest server I got last night has a intel pro 1000 a rarity
:)
I am just giving feedback as when I speak to people in the datacentre and
hosting business the biggest gripe with freebsd is hardware compatability,
as I adore freebsd I ignore th
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 02:20:58AM +, Chris wrote:
> On 01/03/2008, Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 01/03/2008, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > You working round what I just said. A nic should perform equally well
> > > as it does in other operating systems just beca
On 01/03/2008, Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/03/2008, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You working round what I just said. A nic should perform equally well
> > as it does in other operating systems just because its cheaper its not
> > an excuse for buggy performance. Th
On 01/03/2008, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You working round what I just said. A nic should perform equally well
> as it does in other operating systems just because its cheaper its not
> an excuse for buggy performance. There is also other good network
> cards apart from intel pro 100
On Feb 29, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Chris wrote:
A weakness of freebsd is its fussyness over hardware in particular
network cards, time and time again I see posts here telling people to
go out buying expensive intel pro 1000 cards just so they can use the
operating system properly when I think its re
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 7:45 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Sam Leffler; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Oliver Herold; Kris
> Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance
On 29/02/2008, Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 15:44 +, Chris wrote:
> > On 29/02/2008, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > A weakness of freebsd is its fussyness over hardware in particular
> > network cards, time and time again I see posts here tel
At 10:44 AM 2/29/2008, Chris wrote:
A weakness of freebsd is its fussyness over hardware in particular
network cards, time and time again I see posts here telling people to
go out buying expensive intel pro 1000 cards just so they can use the
operating system properly when I think its reasonable
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 15:44 +, Chris wrote:
> On 29/02/2008, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A weakness of freebsd is its fussyness over hardware in particular
> network cards, time and time again I see posts here telling people to
> go out buying expensive intel pro 1000 cards
; > Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Kris Kennaway; Oliver Herold;
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
> >
> >
> > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > >
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: [E
>> To: Oliver Herold; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> >> freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
> >> Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
> >>
> >>
> >> Oliver Herold wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I saw this b
Adrian Chadd wrote:
(Sorry for top posting.)
Its not actually -that- bad an idea to compare different applications.
It sets the "bar" for how far the entire system {hardware, OS,
application, network} can be pushed.
If nsd beats bind9 by say 5 or 10% over all, then its nothing to write
home abo
riginal Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
> >> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
> >> To: Oliver Herold; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> >> freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
> >> Subj
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
> To: Oliver Herold; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD
O. Hartmann wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
[SCHNIPP]
* 7.0 with ULE has a bug on this workload (actually to do with
workloads involving high interrupt rates). It is fixed in 8.0.
will this patch also be available for 7.0?
If you mean "will it be merged to RELENG_7", absolutely. If you mean
Kris Kennaway wrote:
[SCHNIPP]
* 7.0 with ULE has a bug on this workload (actually to do with workloads
involving high interrupt rates). It is fixed in 8.0.
will this patch also be available for 7.0?
Regards,
Oliver
___
freebsd-performance@freebs
Chris wrote:
* 7.0 with ULE has a bug on this workload (actually to do with workloads
involving high interrupt rates). It is fixed in 8.0.
Kris can you say anything more about interrupt workload bugs on ULE?
On all my 7.0 servers I now am using ULE even on the UP ones as it was
said there is s
>
> * 7.0 with ULE has a bug on this workload (actually to do with workloads
> involving high interrupt rates). It is fixed in 8.0.
Kris can you say anything more about interrupt workload bugs on ULE?
On all my 7.0 servers I now am using ULE even on the UP ones as it was
said there is slight impr
Oliver Herold wrote:
Hi,
I saw this bind benchmarks just some minutes ago,
http://new.isc.org/proj/dnsperf/OStest.html
is this true for FreeBSD 7 (current state: RELENG_7/7.0R) too? Or is
this something verified only for the state of development back in August
2007?
I have been trying to rep
35 matches
Mail list logo
