Finally got this machine up 5.4-STABLE
Dual 244 2GB RAM 5 x Seagate 400GB on HPT1820A
Initial tests using:
nttcp -T -n10 from two clients
1. WinXP P4 Intel gE
2. FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE dual PIII 733 Intel gE ( 4x WD250 IDE on HPT374)
To the test machine 78MB/s
I could well be saturating the cli
Sean wrote:
> I've been experimenting with the idea of doing channel bonding as a
> means of improving the performance of some heavily used file servers.
> Currently I am using a single Intel 1000MT interface on each file
> server and it has rather lack luster performance.
>
I've been experimenting with the idea of doing channel bonding as a
means of improving the performance of some heavily used file servers.
Currently I am using a single Intel 1000MT interface on each file
server and it has rather lack luster performance.
I've set two ports of my switch
> Are the gig nics in 64bit slots? 32bit slots can slow you down a bunch.
> Also, I've seen some cases where the PCI bus itself is the bottleneck
> with multiple high-IO boards installed on the same bus.
>
Yes. The 3ware card and the Dual Port em are both in the PCI-X 100
slots (the first two)
- Original Message -
From: "Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eric Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: 22 April 2005 17:50
Subject: Re: Channel bonding.
Are the gig nics in 64bit slots? 32bit slots can slow you down a bunch.
Also, I've seen some cases where
Sean wrote:
I've been experimenting with the idea of doing channel bonding as a
means of improving the performance of some heavily used file servers.
Currently I am using a single Intel 1000MT interface on each file
server and it has rather lack luster performance.
[..snip..]
In case anyon
