28.05.2013 10:08, O. Hartmann:
Phoronix has emitted another of its "famous" performance tests
comparing different flavours of Linux (their obvious favorite OS):
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=bsd_linux_8way&num=1
It is "impressive, too, to see that PHORONIX did not benchmark
20.11.2012 23:03, Mike Jakubik wrote:
I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about
config,
but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting.
And they
are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2.
Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing w
15.12.2011 15:48, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'm getting to the point where I'm considering formulating a private
mail to Jeff Roberson, requesting that he be aware of the discussion
that's happening (not that he necessarily follow or read it), and that
based on what I can tell we're at a roadblock -
30.08.2011 12:23, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
[Taking random email.]
I think we could merge the $subj web page with this one (which is
more actual, as of 7.0): http://www.freebsd.org/features.html
The pages serve different purposes. There's no point in elaborating
about feature X if feature X su
27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
I think this one would better look like list of major features with os
comparison, like:
= Networking
ivo tasev wrote:
Hi all,
i have machine with 2 x Quad Core Xeon cpu`s 2G ram and 4 3ware disks in
raid10. There is 6.2 Stable on it and mysql 5.0 from the ports.
The mysql is installed with the following build options:
WITH_XCHARSET=all WITH_OPENSSL=yes BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes WITH_ARCHIVE=yes
W
