Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:00:05AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, December 22, 2011 6:58:46 pm Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:44:14AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > Hi, > &g

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-22 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
clear: > > man make.conf(5) says, that MALLOC_PRODUCTION is a knob set in > /etc/make.conf. > The WiJi says, MALLOC_PRODUCTION is to be set in /etc/src.conf. > > What's right and what's wrong now? I can say with certainty that this value belongs in /etc/make.conf (on RE

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
ystem to store logs/data results. The KTR stuff Atillio and many others have requested, I think, will be the most beneficial way to get the developers the data they need. I had no idea about it until I found out that KTR was something completely different than ktrace. I still haven't found

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
ies and provide the data somewhere central for devs to review. I only mention this because so far I haven't seen anyone really say "okay, this is what we should be using for these kinds of tests". Yay nature of the beast. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at p

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011-12-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: > 2011/12/13 Jeremy Chadwick : > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> > Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an > >> > issue. And yes, ther

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
rbour a community of folks who are more argumentative/aggressive than, say, Linux (generally speaking). In this thread though, I think all of us really want to assist in some way to figure out what exactly is going on here, scheduler-wise, and see if we can put something together to han

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011-12-13 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
n 7.1-RELEASE came out on 2009/01/05. "All of the answers", in a roundabout and non-user-friendly way, are available by examining the commit history for src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c. It's hard to follow especially given that you have to consider all the releases/branchpoints th

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011-12-13 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
in as they see fit. I know folks were focused mainly on buildworld. I personally would find it interesting if someone with a higher-end system (e.g. 2 physical CPUs, with 6 or 8 cores per CPU) was to do the same test (changing -jX to -j{numofcores} of course). -- | Jeremy Chadwick

Re: TTY task group scheduling

2010-11-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
chnical innards/workings of GEOM since the documentation is so poor (and reading the code doesn't help, especially with regards to libgeom). IMHO, the gsched "stuff", as a "layer", should probably be moved into the I/O framework by default, with t

Re: CPU Utilization on IBM x3755

2008-08-15 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
, 112M Buf, 57M Free Swap: 8192M Total, 228K Used, 8192M Free Regarding why you're adding up all the individual process statistics: I can imagine they would vary a slight bit, but I cannot explain a 7% variance. Someone with more knowledge will have to assist there. -- | Jeremy Chadwick