On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:31:46 +0100 "O. Hartmann"
wrote:
> So far, FreeBSD does have the support of a native driver by nVidia.
> But there are no compatible FreeBSD VUDA libraries, there is no
> working "compiler" (nvcc does only run on Linux and expects still in
> conjunction with the CUDA SDK 4.
Quoting Julian Wissmann (from Wed, 8 Feb
2012 18:33:53 +0100):
1086 tor RET read 1568/0x620
1086 tor CALL clock_gettime(0xd,0x7fffd910)
1086 tor RET clock_gettime 0
1086 tor CALL
kevent(0x3,0x3e18000,0x2,0x3dbe000,0x400,0x7fffd920)
1086 tor GI
Hi,
while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place.
Now... in case someone here is willing to help instead of talking, feel free to
go to http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice and have a look what can be
improved. The page is far from perfect and needs some additio
Hi,
I suggest to add the content to the wiki, improve it (together with other
people) and then to fix the man-page with the result.
If you want write access to the wiki just register with FirstnameLastname and
tell me or any other FreeBSD comitter with wiki access about it so that we can
han
Hi,
feel free to add an entry to the ideas list in the wiki, it is prominently
linked in the top current links section. If you don't have access and don't
want to register, just provide a nice text in the style of the ideas page and
someone can add it.
And related to the subject: wasn't it you
Quoting Martin Matuska (from Thu, 10 Mar 2011
22:33:37 +0100):
Hi everyone,
we have performed a benchmark of the perl binary compiled with base gcc,
ports gcc and ports clang using the perlbench benchmark suite.
Our benchmark was performed solely on amd64 with 10 different processors
and we
Quoting Alexander Best (from Fri, 19 Nov 2010
00:17:10 +):
17:51 @ Genesys : Luigi Rizzo had a plugabble scheduler back in 4.* or \
thereabouts
17:51 @ Genesys : you could kldload new ones and switch to them on the fly
17:52 @ arundel : wow. that sounds cool. too bad it didn't make i
Quoting Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Nov 2008
10:55:39 +0100):
2008/11/26 Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If you want to test OS performance and use Java programs in there to do so,
you would use the same Java version, wouldn't you? They didn't
Quoting Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 25 Nov 2008
21:46:35 +0100):
2008/11/25 Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/11/25 Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I believe most of the synthetic numbers (mp3 encoding etc.) difference
comes from the different version of gcc the different
Quoting Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 23 Nov 2008
13:50:35 -1000 (HST)):
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Attilio Rao wrote:
2008/11/23, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting Attilio Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:02:22
+0100):
pmc
Quoting Attilio Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 24 Nov 2008
00:46:29 +0100):
2008/11/23, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting Attilio Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:02:22
+0100):
> pmcannotate is a tool that prints out sources of a too
Quoting Attilio Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 23 Nov 2008
14:02:22 +0100):
pmcannotate is a tool that prints out sources of a tool (in C or
assembly) with inlined profiling informations retrieved by a prior
pmcstat analysis.
If compared with things like callgraph generation, it prints out
Quoting Rahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:17:46 -0400):
For example: I would like to run a high performance web server that
can handle up to 200 connections per second and serve them with great
speed. That's where the concern for multi-threaded support. Depending
Serving 200
Quoting Vince Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 19 May 2008
22:45:29 +0100):
Yani Brankov wrote:
Hey guys,
Hi
I recently updated to FreeBSD 7 and noticed that my box started to
perform as windows does under heavier loads. The mouse starts to be
Which scheduler? ULE or BSD? Try th
Quoting Miroslav Lachman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 29 Jan 2008
20:45:30 +0100):
Alan Amesbury wrote:
Alan Amesbury wrote:
[snip]
I'd like to run bsnmpd, but need the UCD-MIB for other performance
monitoring. I could run net-snmp and proxy requests through it to
bsnmpd, but that stri
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 24 Jan 2008
12:08:07 +0100):
Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
In case you have some space left for more machines, maybe someone
is willing to help out by sponsoring some. Just tell us how many
machines y
Quoting Erik Cederstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 23 Jan 2008
21:59:42 +0100):
Finally, in the interests of making your life more complicated, it
would be neat to graph performance across a set of FreeBSD branches
overlaid or vertically offset so you could monitor, say, MySQL
per
Quoting Gergely CZUCZY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:21:16 +0100):
> Is there some wiki pages or any writings on this issue? I'm not so
> familiar with this COMPAT_43 obsolated stuff, and I'd like to
> know what's going on, what's the problem, and so on...
http://www.freebsd.org/project
Quoting Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 24 Sep 2007
10:10:29 -0700):
Julian Elischer wrote:
Sanket Somnath Hase wrote:
Hi Matt ,
We are graduate students at Carnegie Mellon University. We are enrolled in
a course (Operating systems practicum http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~412/ ) which
Quoting Alan Amesbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:56:04 -0600):
> Looking at /usr/include/sys/mount.h, I see that there are two flags
> defined: MNT_SYNCHRONOUS and MNT_ASYNC. I'm not sure why both flags
> exist, but suspect the former was added so you could mount UFS/FFS/UFS2
> fil
Quoting Cheffo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:38:45 +0200):
Hi,
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
- Original Message - From: "O. Hartmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:38 AM
Subject: (S)ATA performance in FBSD 6.2/7.0
The last days I tried to figur
Quoting "Steven H. Baeighkley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Fri, 16 Feb
2007 16:40:46 -0700):
These servers are running apache, perl, proftpd and php. One server is
running 4.11 and is rocking the world, load is rarely above 1 and is
regularly below .5. The other server is running 6.2 and regular
Quoting Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:37:53 +1100 (EST)):
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > On 22/12/06, David Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I suspect in such a test, memory copying speed will be a key factor,
> >> I don't have number to back up my
Quoting Borja Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 25 Oct 2006
10:44:42 +0200):
According to the bind9 port makefile, using threads is _not_
recommended. Specifically, it seems it's a recommendation from ISC
It would be a good idea to add this note. It's good to experiment with
performance
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500):
I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs
with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the
first results. The first tests are for serving up static data.
I added this to
http://w
Quoting Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:00:54 +0100):
On 16/10/06, Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He might have got further by volunteering to create and supply profiles
for those specific workloads that were faster in 4.x than 6.x on UP
machinery etc... i.e. hel
Quoting Dan Lukes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:43:20 +0200):
[moved from security@ to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The main problem is - 6.x is still not competitive replacement for
4.x. I'm NOT speaking about old unsupported hardware - I speaked about
performance in some situatio
Quoting Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Fri, 6 Oct
2006 09:57:38 +0200):
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:52:51PM -0400, Jerry Bell wrote:
I have a Dell PE2950 with 2 dual core 3.73Ghz processors and 4G of ram.
I've looked through some of the lists here and have seen super-smack
results in
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:57:34 +
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ah thanks for correcting me, so libthr and libpthread are both new then in
> 5.x?
Yes.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
The best things in life are free, but the
expensive ones are still worth a look.
http://w
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 01:28:07 +
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> have had mysql lockups until I tinkered with the threading settings. Libthr
> is the good old threading routine from the 4.x days if I am correct, so if
> libpthread is indeed unstable under continous heavy load how has it become
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:31:03 +
Joao Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/10/05, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> >
> > > I have done many tests to try to determine the poor performance on my
> > > systems (FreeBSD-current connected dir
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does FreeBSD have any facilities setup for peoople wishing to work on
'sub projects' collaboratively? Something akin to http://pgfoundry.org
for PostgreSQL?
No, there's no such thing. But what stops you from using SF (or something
similar) as a CVS reposito
32 matches
Mail list logo
