On 2012-11-20 04:56 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Mike Jakubik wrote:
These numbers show very significant improvements. Any
possibility/interests in porting this scheduler to FreeBSD or this
too
much work? I know many have and still complain about our current
scheduler.
Just for the record.
Am 11/20/12 22:56, schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
> Mike Jakubik wrote:
>> On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about
config,
but the fact that DF
Mike Jakubik wrote:
On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about
config,
but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting.
And they
are very
Den 20/11/2012 kl. 22.03 skrev Mike Jakubik
:
> On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>>> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config,
>>> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3
On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about
config,
but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting.
And they
are very close to performanc
