On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:12:32 +0100
Ivan Voras wrote:
> I've also noticed it is bursty - this can be moderated by tuning
> vfs.zfs.txg.timeout and vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending. But I think you
> must agree that 210 MB/s on a single drive looks impossible :) I get
> that much in a SAS RAID-10 configur
On 10/01/2011 14:07, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:49:08 +0100
Ivan Voras wrote:
It depends - since ZFS is logging all the time it doesn't have to
seek as much; if all transactions are WRITE and given sequentially,
they will be written to the drive sequentially, even with full fsync
On Jan 10, 2011, at 07:49 , Gholam Mostafa Faridi wrote:
> I use FreeBSD AMD64 with Gnome , my friend manage VPN on FreeBSD box and it
> use L2tp method.
> So my friend say when I want use it , I must use it with l2tp method or way ,
> I search google and I see I can use l2tp for connect to VPN
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:49:08 +0100
Ivan Voras wrote:
> It depends - since ZFS is logging all the time it doesn't have to
> seek as much; if all transactions are WRITE and given sequentially,
> they will be written to the drive sequentially, even with full fsync
> semantics. But 75k IOPS is a bit
On 07/01/2011 16:23, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Hi,
Having in mind that a SAS enterprise disk normally can handle 150-180IOPS, this
benchmark is testing something else ;)
It depends - since ZFS is logging all the time it doesn't have to seek
as much; if all transactions are WRITE and given sequen
