On Nov 18, 2010, at 18:43, Julian Elischer wrote:
we are part of the way there..
at least we did abstract the scheduler to the point where we have
two completely different ones. you are welcome to develop a
'framework as you describe and plug it into the abstraction we
already have.
It
Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Bruce Cran :
Have you tried increasing kern.sched.preempt_thresh? According to
http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.stable/browse_thread/thread/05a39f816fd8acc6/82affa9f195b747d?lnk=raot&fwc=1&pli=1
a good value for desktop use would be 224.
Hmm, I
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Lucius Windschuh
wrote:
> 2010/11/18 Bruce Cran :
>>Have you tried increasing kern.sched.preempt_thresh? According to
>>http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.stable/browse_thread/thread/05a39f816fd8acc6/82affa9f195b747d?lnk=raot&fwc=1&pli=1
>>a good value
On Thu Nov 18 10, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> >On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> >>On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev
> >>wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> >>>Alexander Best wrote:
> >>>
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matth
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:59:43PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
>>
>> well i did exactly what they did in the video. watch a 1080p video and move
>> the output window around while compiling the kernel.
>>
>
> It is trivial to bring ULE to its k
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> > Alexander Best wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> >> > Alexa
On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard t
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> Alexander Best wrote:
>
>> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
>> > Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
>> > >
>> > > judgi
2010/11/18 Bruce Cran :
>Have you tried increasing kern.sched.preempt_thresh? According to
>http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.stable/browse_thread/thread/05a39f816fd8acc6/82affa9f195b747d?lnk=raot&fwc=1&pli=1
>a good value for desktop use would be 224.
Hmm, I though I tried this -- bu
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:59:43PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> well i did exactly what they did in the video. watch a 1080p video and move
> the output window around while compiling the kernel.
>
It is trivial to bring ULE to its knees. If you
have N cores then all you need is N+1 cpu int
On Thu Nov 18 10, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> Alexander Best wrote:
>
> > On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> > > Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> > > >
> > > > judging from th
Lucius writes:
> And using "idprio 1 $cmd" as a workaround is, well, a kludge.
You have to be root to use idprio, requiring a suid wrapper,
which strikes me as kludgy.
The worst part is that idprio and rtprio don't entirely work.
An idprio process can still interfere with a rtprio process. :-(
R
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> > Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> > >
> > > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
> >
>
[ Trim CC a bit]
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:56:35PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> >
> > Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience
> > is that Linux's interactive response when under heavy lo
On 11/18/10 19:55, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP an
On 11/18/10 19:28, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that Linux's
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:55:05 +0100
Lucius Windschuh wrote:
> Because currently, my machine is barely usable if a compile job with
> parallelism is running. Movies stutter, Firefox hangs. And even nice
> -n 20 doesn't do the job in every case, as +20 seems not to be the
> idle priority anymore?!?
[removed current and stable from Cc list]
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:55:05 +0100
Lucius Windschuh wrote:
> Because currently, my machine is barely usable if a compile job with
> parallelism is running. Movies stutter, Firefox hangs. And even nice
> -n 20 doesn't do the job in every case, as +20 seem
On 11/18/10 10:55 AM, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
>> Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
>> >
>> > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
>>
>> Well, my
On Nov 18, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
>>> On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon :
> [Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
>
> Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
> pattern
> and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP and SCHED_ULE, or?
Because currently, m
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:39, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Frankly, I'm also turned off by the attempt to popup a full page ad in
> addition to the rest of the advertising content which surrounds what is
> nominally supposed to be the real content. That doesn't mean there is
> anything wrong with th
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
>
> Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that Linux's interactive response when under heavy load w
on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
> On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
>> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
>> This one's from Linux.
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1
>
> Well,
> it would be nice to have thos
On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1
Well,
it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this
will make it in due tim
27 matches
Mail list logo
