At 08:54 PM 12/1/2007, Peter Losher wrote:
Manjunath R Gowda wrote:
> On 12/1/07, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 3ware driver is under GIANT at 7.x. I don't know if it's the same for
>> linux.
>
> It is not under GIANT any more, MPSAFE starting from 7.0 BETA1.
I know in one cas
Manjunath R Gowda wrote:
> On 12/1/07, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 3ware driver is under GIANT at 7.x. I don't know if it's the same for
>> linux.
>
> It is not under GIANT any more, MPSAFE starting from 7.0 BETA1.
I know in one case on a box running BETA2 the kernel dmesg re
On 12/1/07, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> 3ware driver is under GIANT at 7.x. I don't know if it's the same for
> linux.
It is not under GIANT any more, MPSAFE starting from 7.0 BETA1.
-Manjunath
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 17:33:34 +0100 Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> I am using sysbench, with read-write tests.
> The test-table has 10M tuples, and i'm querying it for two minutes.
[...]
> The testbox has a dual opteron 246, 12G of memory and a 3ware-9550 with
> two disks in a mirror for the rootfs (also t
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 04:06:55PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 03:56 PM 12/1/2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
I don't quite understand the question. It's the very same box, with
a dualboot configuration.
Fire up the 3ware controller's RAID management sof
> I just ran through some of my benchmarks on a kernel build from
> sources as of today, and I've noticed an improvement for the ffmpeg
> workload. Here's a comparison of 4bsd, ule (BETA1) and ule (BETA3).
> This is vanilla source with no patches applied:
Sorry, the ministat output was mangled. I'
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 04:06:55PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 03:56 PM 12/1/2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> >I don't quite understand the question. It's the very same box, with
> >a dualboot configuration.
>
> Fire up the 3ware controller's RAID management software and make sure the
> same writ
At 03:56 PM 12/1/2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
I don't quite understand the question. It's the very same box, with
a dualboot configuration.
Fire up the 3ware controller's RAID management software and make sure
the same write caching strategy is set for FreeBSD and Linux. The
driver my default
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:53:08PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 11:33 AM 12/1/2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> >> >
> >> >The box is a dual opteron 246 with 12GB of memory with 10K RPM
> >> >SATA disks on a 9550 3ware.
> >> >
> >> >So, what can cause this big difference?
>
> Are the caching options
At 11:33 AM 12/1/2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> >
> >The box is a dual opteron 246 with 12GB of memory with 10K RPM
> >SATA disks on a 9550 3ware.
> >
> >So, what can cause this big difference?
Are the caching options for the 3ware the same on FreeBSD as Linux ?
---Mike
_
Jeff,
I just ran through some of my benchmarks on a kernel build from
sources as of today, and I've noticed an improvement for the ffmpeg
workload. Here's a comparison of 4bsd, ule (BETA1) and ule (BETA3).
This is vanilla source with no patches applied:
x 4bsd
+ ule
* uleb3
+-
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:31:50PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> I've forwarded this mail to the freebsd performance list so more people can
> take a look at it. Thanks for all of the details. What
> was the test that you're doing? sysbench? With writes or without? Or some
> other benchmark
Jeff Roberson wrote:
[...]
the MySQL binary is statically linked, i've built it
that way.
ldd: /usr/local/libexec/mysqld: not a dynamic executable
Though, maybe I should rebuild it dynamically to ensure it's
linked against libthr (and not pthread or c_r)...
So, any tips, guesses, anything what
13 matches
Mail list logo
