Synopsis: ifconfig(8): ifconfig -l (address_family) does not work correctly on
RELENG-7
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: will
State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 25 00:05:19 UTC 2009
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in r199770 (HEAD).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118
will added a subscriber: will.
will added a comment.
What testing has been done with this change?
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1881
To: rstone, jfvogel
Cc: will, emaste, pjd, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
will added a comment.
>>! In D1881#9, @rstone wrote:
> The primary testing that I did was to ensure that a kernel with "device zfs"
> would still link. However, I suppose that doesn't exclude the possibility of
> their being an zfs source file that is built
will accepted this revision.
will added a reviewer: will.
will added a comment.
Ok, LGTM. Thanks for your effort!
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1881
To: rstone, jfvogel, will
Cc: will, emaste, pjd, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net
Hi,
I'm working to port forward to FreeBSD/head, improvements made to FIB
handling by my colleagues Alan Somers and Justin Gibbs.
Please review: http://people.freebsd.org/~will/fix-fib-issues.1.diff
This patch includes fixes for several issues relating to FIBs:
* Use of dhclient with non
o0 addresses, but perhaps
this is something that should be configurable? i.e. allow the
administrator to specify in rc.conf which FIBs lo0's host route should
be placed on?
--Will.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
fferent
protocol number relatively easily.
FreeBSD could allow configuring CARP to silently ignore invalid
packets. That would definitely be trivial to implement, but it
doesn't solve the issue that a particular network segment might be
running fuss
The following reply was made to PR bin/118987; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Will Andrews
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/118987: ifconfig(8): ifconfig -l (address_family) does not
work correctly on RELENG-7
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:29:52 -0700
nd my patch agree that
it isn't the nicest of ways to make it possible to load carp (or any
other protocol) as a module.
Regards,
--Will.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will Andrews wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've written a patch (against 8.0-CURRENT as of r191369) which makes
>> it possible to build, load, run, & unload CARP as a module, using
t. Only IPv6
> multicast group setup should be affected.
>
> Does your patch apply against these revisions OK?
It should. I am using git to develop these patches. I just did
another sync (to r191794) and the diff from svn to my local git branch
is the same as the patch I posted last night
=0<> metric 0 mtu 1460
>> syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128
>> carp1: flags=9 metric 0 mtu 1500
>> carp: INIT vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 50
>>
>> What have I missed?
Hi,
Currently, the only way to assign an IP address for CARP is to use an
IP that is in
Hi,
Please see:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=272386
This change removes sysctl nodes that were added during lacp_attach(), which
causes a lock order reversal (sleepable lock while holding non-sleepable).
These sysctl nodes arrived in:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?vie
nic.3
* box.A.nic.2 --cable--> box.B.nic.2
...etc...
See above.
> Any help will be really appreciated. Thanks.
What is it you're actually trying to do? Something more than ping
yourself, I imagine...
--
o--{ Will Maier }--o
| jab
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:03:58AM -0800, Walter Goralski wrote:
> The missing piece has been DOS SYN attacks. I have the really common
> "synk4.c" source that is all over the Web, but I get errors when I try to
> compile it ("it's the linux includes" someone told me). Now, I last used my
They're
ct data, or not enough, please ask. Please cc me on the reply as
I'm not on the list.
Thanks,
Will
Here is my config file for racoon.
/usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf
path include "/usr/local/etc/racoon" ;
path pre_shared_key "/usr/local/etc/racoon/psk.txt" ;
log de
es on FreeBSD and
OpenNMS?
Thanks,
Will
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hello (please cc: me as I am not subscribed, thanks),
I was wondering if anyone has managed to set up bridge in such a
way that hosts on both sides will be able to access the machine
doing the bridging. The reason I need this is because I need to
join two media types (10baseT/100baseTX and
Are there any plans to support vlan pseudo intefaces with a ng_fec or ng_one2many
parent? I would like to create some sort of failover or aggregation with one of my
servers, but unfortunately it is using an 802.1Q trunk.
-Will
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
rietary hashing
algorithm" is for the etherchannel implementation on new Catalyst devices? Their
documentation suggests that they aren't doing an XOR on the last 2 bits of the MAC
addresses anymore.
-Will
_
Will Saxon
Systems Programmer - Netwo
_fec.c
Regardless, it doesn't look like ng_fec can work with ng_vlan, since
it doesn't provide any hooks to work with.
-Will
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacob S. Barrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 5:17 PM
> To: Will Saxon
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding
>
>
> On Monday 08 March 2004
22 matches
Mail list logo
