thank you all guys for your answers.
Peter, of course it's not my homework!! in fact, i have a program which
manages dhcp. i want to limit the number of ip address which can be
assigned by dhcp server. in order to do that, i should know how many ip
addresses are available in the range that is d
hi every body
i wanna configure a freebsd box as a switch. in order to do that, i bridged
all my interfaces to have switching and it works fine. after that i want to
have vlans on it. as you know, in a real switch, a vlan is configured just
by assigning a port to it without any additional configur
hi every body
i wanna configure a freebsd box as a switch. in order to do that, i bridged
all my interfaces to have switching and it works fine. after that i want to
have vlans on it. as you know, in a real switch, a vlan is configured just
by assigning a port to it without any additional configur
stead of assigning an
> IP.
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 00:08, saeedeh motlagh
> wrote:
> > hi every body
> >
> > i wanna configure a freebsd box as a switch. in order to do that, i
> bridged
> > all my interfaces to have switching and it works fine. after that i wa
port 5 priority 128 path cost 2
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Alireza Torabi wrote:
> ŮŽAlso it's a good idea to to attach a ifconfig output.
>
> On 12/17/11, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
> > when i do that, the vlan is defined but from a system in a vlan, i can't
>
ork, and after that connect ports to each other according
> to your scheme.
>
>
> --
> your sweet isn't ready yet
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:01 AM, saeedeh motlagh
> wrote:
> > i have 3 freebsd system: 0.28 , 0.25 and 0.12 which 28 is assumed to be
>
;> In this scheme i can ping 192.168.2.2 from 192.168.2.1 just fine, so
>> if your question was "will bridge work without ip addresses", then
>> answer is "yes".
>>
>> --
>> your sweet isn't ready yet
>>
>>
>>
>&
, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On 12/24/2011 4:09 PM, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
>
>> hi again and thanks for all your replies
>> i've reviewed all suggestions and tested them all but i still haven't
>> reached an exact answer to my own scenario.
>>
thank you guys for your answers but my problem is not solved yet:((
the thing is, i wanna have something like this:
a freebsd box which acts like switch (for example cisco 2960). i want to
define vlanX on one interface (without any ip address) and it tags any
passing packets through that interface
, Juli Mallett wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:26, saeedeh motlagh
> wrote:
> > thank you guys for your answers but my problem is not solved yet:((
> >
> > the thing is, i wanna have something like this:
> > a freebsd box which acts like switch (for example cis
hello guys,
i wanna have authentication via radius server. in my local network,
one system is radius server and the others are clients. the server is
running well. when a client login, it sends an access-request to the
server. if the user name and password are defined in the server, the
server sen
radius.so")
>
> cat /etc/radius.conf
>
> auth 10.5.21.4:1645 "SuperSkret" 3 2
> auth 10.5.21.5:1645 "SuperSkret" 3 2
>
> ~Paul
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:24:03AM +0330, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
>> hello gu
i think i have similar problem too. you want to have tagged and
untagged traffic at the same time on the trunk port, right?
in your topology the vlans and trunk port are bridged and the tagged
traffic is passed through the trunk port and every thing works fine.
then when you want to have the untag
hello guys
i want to install the openvswitch 1.4.0 from a linux package. the below
command should be executed:
./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/'uname -r '/build
this is a linux command and i should execute the FreeBSD equivalent but i
don't know how to do that. the manual says:
To build t
i have this problem too. please let me know if you find the solution.
thanks
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:07 PM, h bagade wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Nikolay Denev wrote:
>>
>> > On Aug 11, 2012, at 11:07 AM, h bagade wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > I want to use t
i know in RFC 1644 TCP packets SYN and FIN flags are set for some testing
issues but not sure if it has being used in any other issues*.**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:57 PM, h bagade wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to add this option to kernel in order to defeating Nmap
> OS-Fingerprintin
16 matches
Mail list logo