yushun.
________
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
University of Southern California
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> > I tried to measure bandwidth with IPComp enabled, but kept
> > getting the error message "no response" from netperf
> > (/usr/ports/benchmark/netperf).
> >
> > For all I could tell from tcpdump, netperf established ctrl
> > channel, and about 5 to 8 packets were sent with I
etdomain,IPPROTO_IPCOMP, PR_ATOMIC|PR_ADDR,
- ipcomp4_input,0, 0, 0,
- 0,
- 0,0, 0, 0,
&nousrreqs
},
#ifdef IPSEC_ESP
________
Yu-Shun Wang <[
lease boxes (PIII 733MHz,
256MB RDRAM) connected through Ethernet switch.
Thanks,
yushun.
____
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Science
Hi,
What you pointed out below is true. But I am more
interested in the relative performance since the number
I measured were under exactly the same setup and traffic
condition. I am just curious why IPComp was _relatively_
(and signigicantly) slower than m
eeBSD.
yushun
____
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
University of Southern California
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
;s in either
-stable or -current. Probably will be included in
FreeBSD 4.3.
regards,
yushun.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> Hi Yu-Shun,
>
> -On [20010308 22:05], Yu-Shun Wang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Has the topic of
n't use that many gifs
in their notebooks. :-)
yushun.
________
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
University of Southern California
Hi,
I think it's specified in RFC 2644. It might be useful
to site it in the comments of the code.
Regards,
yushun.
____
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Informati
.
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
University of Southern California
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Remko Lodder wrote:
Hi friends,
I was looking around for using IPsec services instead of
OpenVPN services, but I found out that with our current
implementation of IPsec, we cannot actually route packets
through the various IPsec hops [1]. OpenBSD adds IPsec
flows in their routing table, making
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 8/18/06, Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remko Lodder wrote:
> I was looking around for using IPsec services instead of
> OpenVPN services, but I found out that with our current
> implementation of IPsec, we cannot actually route packets
> t
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 8/18/06, Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<... snip the orig Q, rfc3884 bits, and the gif stuff...>
You won't have any problem is you are using IP-IP
13 matches
Mail list logo
