0n Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:44:48PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>OK, I setup 2 boxes on either end of a RELENG_7 box from about May
>7th just now, to see with 2 boxes blasting across it how it would
>work. *However*, this is with no firewall loaded and, I must enable
>ip fast
0n Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:00:31AM +0200, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
>Dear Alex,
>
>>>OK, I setup 2 boxes on either end of a RELENG_7 box from about May
>>>7th just now, to see with 2 boxes blasting across it how it would
>>>work. *However*, this is with no fire
0n Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:41:36PM -0400, Paul wrote:
>All the NIC drivers in 7 pretty much use interrupt moderation so it can
>never lock the machine anyway.. This effectively kills polling and it
>really no longer has any use except to be able to have a fraction of the
>c
0n Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:04:52AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>After some chat with other TCP folks I'm going to commit the TCP ECN patch
>I asked for review a couple months ago with some changes. Most notably is
>the new padding fields added to the syncache struct.
Um, what is "TCP
0n Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:58:18AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>One of the big selling points of IPFW is integration with DUMMYNET, which
>offers bandwidth management facilities not present in the other systems.
I
>understand there may be efforts afoot to add DUMMYNET support
0n Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:31:58AM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>0n Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:58:18AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
>>One of the big selling points of IPFW is integration with DUMMYNET,
which
>>offers bandwidth management faci
0n Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:48:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
> I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known
> networking conditions to test out a component for a product at work.
> I was wondering if there was a network simulator a
0n Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:39:06PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> I have also seen 700Mb/s sustained FreeBSD - FreeBSD using the openssh HPN
> patch set and no extra tuning of the network stack. Which makes me
> think that maybe the linux stack needs some tuning?
What is the "HPN pa
0n Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:17:39PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> If your aliases are part of the same subnet as the "primary" or first
configured IP, then you want to
> use the all-1's netmask. In your case, however, the second IP is part of
a completely different subnet,
> an
0n Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:43:21AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
>Alex, good day.
>
>Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:07:41PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>> > If your aliases are part of the same subnet as the "primary" or
first con
0n Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
> packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
> will it barf?
erm, what is meant by "coalesce" ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the prop
0n Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:19:44PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> FreeBSD customer base has been miniscule so not much has
> been done to the code, maybe someday in my spare time :)
"miniscule" ? That's scary to hear :(
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian
0n Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:56:10PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote:
> Weongyo Jeong sent me a nice netstat patch that allows
> netstat access to SCTP stuff :-D
And for those that don't know much about SCTP, the benefit is ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Austra
0n Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:10:36PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I have two different versions of the talk on video.
> The audio is a bit hard to hear but can still be understood.
> When my RealWork(TM) lets up I will finish transcribing them to
downloadable form.
Can you plea
0n Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:01:11PM -0400, Dave wrote:
>I've got a FreeBSD 6.2 machine now behind a squid nontransparent
>authenticating proxy. The proxy use to be transparent and didn't require
>authentication, those requirements now changed, so it now utilizes a
>dedicated
0n Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 02:48:32PM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>I have been putting together a chapter on 'Link Aggregation and
>Failover', any feedback/corrections/additions would be appreciated.
>http://nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/nzfug/HandbookUpdates/NetworkAggregation
Awesome. Gr
0n Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:47:37PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>0n Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>>I am adding support into the em driver for PTP
>
>PTP ?
Found http://ptpd.sourceforge.net/. Sorry for the noise
0n Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>I am adding support into the em driver for PTP
PTP ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT
1914. If you ha
0n Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:18:34PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>... but, I haven't used wireless at all under FreeBSD ... what do we
support
>*well*? The machine(s) are going to be remote, so I'd like to go with
>something that is generally felt to be 'consistently reliable
Hi all,
Curious, is I/OAT [http://www.intel.com/go/ioat/] coming to FreeBSD soon
?
Seems to be in the works for Linux
[http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:I/OAT] and OpenSolaris
[http://blogs.sun.com/markusflierl/entry/what_s_going_on_in].
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of
0n Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:45:13PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
>Any chance the recent root zone changes would make it to 7.0?
Erm, curious, what where these changes in the first place ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence
Organisation and is subj
FYI
- Forwarded message from Neelakanth Nadgir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 17:34:23 -0700
From: Neelakanth Nadgir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Neelakanth Nadgir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [networking-discuss] uperf - A network benchmark tool
[apologies
0n Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:19:58PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
>If the system is running the simplest thing in order to identifiy
>the PHYs is to check the oui= and model= output of `devinfo -v`.
>Otherwise boot verbose and check the OUI and model output of
>ukphy(4).
Curiou
0n Fri, May 23, 2008 at 05:39:17PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>subject says it all really..
No, but I would like to ... if you could hold my hand :)
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section
Why can some NIC use polling and others not ?
eg I went to turn on polling on my BCM5782 Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit
Ethernet Card. And bge(4) doesn't mention anything about polling.
Is it a hardware feature of the NIC ?
- aW
0n Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:13:51PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy w
Ahhnice !
Please send a HEADSUP when done.
Thanks
- aW
0n Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 07:38:15PM +1030, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 03:54:17PM +1030, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> Why can some NIC use polling and others not ?
>
0n Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 05:52:30PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Nice, needs some cleanup though. Once you have cleaned it up you can run
> it either through me or [EMAIL PROTECTED] He is more of a IPv6 fan than I
am (in my
> book IPv6 is broken by design^TM).
Why ?
- aW
0n Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 09:47:00PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Andre, I know your dislikes about Cisco, and I share it too. Idea
> of maintaining separate filter lists for each interface is handy, no
> matter that it is like in Cisco. Before writing this mail I have a lot
> o
0n Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 03:16:27AM -0500, James wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 03:03:49PM -0800, Mike Hunter wrote:
> > On Dec 17, "Brooks Davis" wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:22:02PM +0200, Donatas wrote:
> > > > hello,
> > > > i'd like to
0n Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 02:50:09PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>> now a dingo branch, named "dingo". The dingo branch contains
>> all of src, not just sys, as I suspect there are userland bits
>> we'll want to do. I know I'll be doing userland things.
0n Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:34:03PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>DeltaT SEQ-SRTR:SEQ_ENDpacket#
>--
>346853 2856:2920(64)1
>370821 2920:4368(1448) 2
>004410 8712:10160(1448) 6
>007848 12608:1405
Hi all,
I would like to find some network simulation software that is similar but
better than NIST Net [http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/nistnet/].
Can anyone recommend any network simulation software that "is a
general-purpose tool for emulating performance dynamics in IP
networks".
Cheers
- aW
___
0n Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:23:29AM +1030, Brooks Davis wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:14:48AM +1030, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to find some network simulation software that is similar
>but
>> be
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:08:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>I see from various searches that netmap support was added to ixl(4) --
>*but* the code isn't there in 10.2. I'd like to be able to use it for
>packet capture, because regular BPF on this interface (XL710) isn't
34 matches
Mail list logo
