Hello.
Iv faced some problem and seems don't realize the mechanincs why does it
occures.
First of all i'd like to notice that my freebsd knowledge and expirience is
limited, especially in such "strange" cases.
In details(code example ill be at the end):
System:
# uname -spr
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE a
First of all thanks for response!
It is normal for syncache entries added == completed == cookies sent, I'm
> mostly curious about anything else besides that. It is possible when using
> the syncache to have the network stack decide it can't create a connection
> until it gets to the end of the 3
> When you enable "net.inet.tcp.log_debug=1" it will tell you at LOG_DEBUG
> level what went wrong and why it sent the RST.
>
Thank you Andre. Now its clear what causes the problem, here is what i got
in logs:
Jul 18 10:33:55 kernel: TCP: [127.0.0.1]:52971 to [127.0.0.1]:10002
tcpflags 0x10; tcp
Hello!
What does this define
COMMENT_ONLY
mean and what for it is used?
Iv met such one in if_arp.h source in freebsd kernel, but cant get such
strange if in arp header structure.
---example
struct arphdr {
<...>
/*
* The remaining fields are variable in size,
On 07/23/11 04:21, Bruce Evans wrote:
C didn't support support variable-sized structs before C99, and
doesn't really support them now. Various hacks are used to make
pseudo-structs larger or smaller than ones that can actually be
declared work. The above is one. The pseudo-struct is malloc()e
Hello.
How to determine which module contains specific functinos?. For example
we have arptimer in netinet/if_ether.c.
But how to find in which ko it compiles?
Iv tried
ls /boot/kernel/ | grep ko.symbols | xargs strings | grep -i arptimer
but that didnt work :(
Thanks in advance.
_
On 09/07/11 18:06, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 04:51:48PM +0400, Vladimir Budnev wrote:
Hello.
How to determine which module contains specific functinos?. For example
we have arptimer in netinet/if_ether.c.
But how to find in which ko it compiles?
Iv tried
ls /boot/kernel
Hello list
I am not sure which list this question must go to, so I am sending to
-net and -ipfw lists.
We have faced some strange problem with ipfw behavior, which we can't
understand ourselves. An it really hurts:(
We are running 7.2-RELEASE.
I'll try to describe the problem as we observe
Typo:
mustbe: We'v noticed that no packets from specific ip(10.10.122.23/32 )
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
> 14.09.2011 15:33, Vladimir Budnev пишет:
>
> > So i think there are at least to questions:
> >
> > 1. Have anyone ever met such situation? Or may be something close to
> > this one with 'hidden' ipfw rules?
>
> Have you tried "ipfw -d -e
10 matches
Mail list logo
