IPV6 problem : nd6_lookup: failed to add route for a neighbor

2008-06-26 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, Running 5.5 (And no "upgrade" messages please, I'm forced to, its out of my hands) and trying to bring up HE's IPV6. I've got it running on a 4.10 system (Ok, feel free to tell me to upgrade, this one is more a lazy issue.. But I am making progress. I bought new drives that'll

Re: IPV6 problem : nd6_lookup: failed to add route for a neighbor

2008-06-27 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > kernel: nd6_lookup: failed to add route for a > > neighbor(2001:0470:0007:0028::0001), errno=17 > > > > Client IPv6 address:2001:470:7:28::2/64 > > > > The script they suggest, and I used, is : > > > > ifconfig gif0 create > > ifconfig gif0 tunnel MYIP 216.66.22.2 > > ifconfig gif0

Re: [freebsd-net] Re: IPV6 problem : nd6_lookup: failed to add route for a neighbor

2008-06-30 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > But once I brought it all up, I got : > > > > kernel: nd6_lookup: failed to add route for a > > neighbor(2001:0470:0007:0028::0001), errno=17 > > With your exact configuration between two 7.0 boxes, I see no indic

Failover default route?

2007-08-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, I know its been talked about before, did 1/2 an hour of Google... In my case, as always, its a bit "special". I have 2 OPENVPN tunnels, which I sent over different transits to the same end host. On that host, I do my NAT. SO, without getting into all sorts of hot/heavy things

Where is IPSec NAT-T support?

2006-10-31 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
>From Larry: > >> I'm interesting FAST_IPSEC support:-). > > > > if Larry or someone else have quickly some time to do it, please let > > me know. > > > > If no one else port that (it shouldn't be too difficult, but takes > > some time), I'll do it "ASAP". > I'll make the time. Should

Converting Cisco shorthand to route statement

2007-02-01 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, I have a line on my router : ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0 I'd like to change it to something that doesn't use the "Tunnel0" as a destination, that could be used in a "route" statement. Thanks, Tuc ___

Re: Converting Cisco shorthand to route statement

2007-02-01 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a line on my router : > > > > ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0 > > > > > > I'd like to change it to something that > > doesn't use the &qu