Hey all,
I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (huray, welcome
to me!) so bare with me, please.
I'm reading up on Netgraph on how I can integrate it with FreeBSD jails and
I was looking at some of the examples provided in
/usr/share/examples/netgraph and now have the followin
encrypting that with IPsec or
wireguard or would be an option, but it would be nicer if I could use
a Netgraph-native option.
Regards,
Tom
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 10:06, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (huray, welcom
12:13 PM, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> > Hey Eugen,
> >
> > For some reason I did not receive your email. But I found your reply in
> the
> > archives.
> >
> > Anyway, the goal is to have two computers, each with a Netgraph bridge
> node
> > and jails connecting
Netgraph.
I don't understand why is everythin doing everything they can _not_ to use
Netgraph?
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 13:47, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
> On 27.05.20 10:06, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (
ote:
> > 27.05.2020 15:06, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (huray,
> welcome
> >> to me!) so bare with me, please.
> >>
> >> I'm reading up on Netgraph on
Hey Meka
You say DHCPD (which to me means the DHCP daemon) but you also mention
"DHCP client"?
I assume the software can be one or the other but not both. Which of
the two do you
mean?
Or is there something I am missing?
Regards,
Tom
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 11:42, Goran Mekić via freebsd-net
w
