On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Drew J. Weaver wrote:
> Say I have a main server Ip address of (This is completely made up)
> 209.190.53.51, and I have 32 IP addresses blocked to it on 209.51.193.32-64
> (or whatever, this is an example) would this alias line still be valid for
> that? I've never do
yeah and thats the reason for the 'or' in that sentance...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Jonathan Graehl wrote:
> > do 'netmask 255.255.255.255' instead or 'netmask 0x' since this is
> > an alias... for some reason otherwise services may not bind to the ip
> > correctly
>
> Why would this be? T
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote:
> At 01:06 27-2-01 +0100, Tobias Fredriksson wrote:
>
>
> >On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Drew J. Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Say I have a main server Ip address of (This is completely made up)
> > > 209.190.53
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > the source of confusion is just the fact that when you ifconfig an
> > interface, you really give two distinct pieces of information:
> > 1. an ip address that the machine recognises as its own
> > 2. a
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Nick Rogness wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Andy [TECC NOPS] wrote:
>
>
> > Can anyone point out the obvious mistake
> > I must be making?
>
> In /etc/rc.conf:
>
> firewall_enable="YES"
>
> I can't remember if you need this even if the kernel is
