As far as I'm able to see, the card is identified, configured and seems to
exist fine (ifconfig -a shows it as up, reports the details, etc before the
card is given any IP or netmask).
wicontrol shows the stats, the IBSS name is correct (of the local access
point I connect to), everything seem
I'm trying to get mpd-netgraph to work so that I can log in to my ISP that
uses PPTP VPN software. I'e read the docs, writen a config file, but it
doesn't seem to be able to connect (or I think it connects, but doesn't
negotiate/authenticate). Stranger still is that when running mpd from the
Well, I've asked 3 or 4 times now in the last 3 weeks, and haven't received
any answers. Posted to comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc and to both questions- and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That leads me to conclude that either I'm: asking the wrong question(s),
asking in an improper manner or asking the wrong p
Hi Joao,
>Well.. hmm eh.. what's your question ?
>
I just posted it a few minutes ago to freebsd-questions (again). Else a
quick search in the archives will show it (search word VPN PPTP mpd).
I was asked not to cross post, but I can also send a copy to you privately
if you would like.
>Rega
Hi Joao, (vôce é português?)
>I don't know much about pptp-client programs merely about the ports >needed
>to
>be open on a firewall in order to pass it trough. But if you say it >won't
>work even with the firewall open, i guess there's not much help I >can
>give
>you..
No, I opened it up and
Still struggling with PPTP...
Trying to decipher the logfile in order to ask more appropriate questions
and get this working.
I have these iface's configured at startup:
dc0 (home LAN 192.168.128.0)
lp0 (? never used)
lo0 (loopback)
ppp0 (? never used)
sl0 (? never used)
faith0 (ipv4 -> ipv6)
w
Still debugging, some questions to verify I have the proper config.
FBSD dual homed host/gw for a home LAN
dc0 home LAN192.168.128.0/24
wi0 ISP WAN 10.10.0.0/16
IPFW and NAT are running, ipfw is wide open at present, natd running -m -s
-dynamic on wi0. Don't know
>Thor Legvold wrote:
Lars, thanks for the files.
I actually got a connection late last night, although I don't know why.
Haven't been able to reproduce the "error" :-)
Regards,
Thor
>>Still debugging, some questions to verify I have the proper config
But I have no idea why. Nor is the link usable. But I'm happy to see I'm
making progress :-)
As far as I can tell, I did exactly what the docs say not to do (and even
generates a warning when loading the bundle) - I set both remote and peer to
0.0.0.0/0, mpd tells me "IPCP: peer address cannot
A few things I've noticed:
The "default" connection speed seems to be 64000 bps according to the log.
The manual states you don't need to set anything regarding bandwidth or
speed unless you're on an asynchronous dialup (modem, etc). I'm on a 11Mbs
wireless WAN, and would like to know if and h
"Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did wax gregarious and thus
spake:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a
>Cisco
> > Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-duplex but I only get 15.6Mbps
> > throughput.
Hi Bill,
> > >I have got 96% of 100Mbps under real production load.
> >
> > Wouldn't the TCP/IP overhead + ethernet design (collisions) reduce >
>figure to more like 70Mbs max in the real world?
>
>1) when people refer to getting 96% of X Mbps, they're referring to
>ethernet frames, not cute
Lars wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am probably screwing something up :-)
> >
> > netstat -rn shows:
> >
> > Internet:
> > DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use Netif
> > Expire
> > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 31 lo0
> > aaa.bbb.ccc.16/28
13 matches
Mail list logo
